Laserfiche WebLink
<br />through 1978. This could be due to the higher rates of ground-water flow in this <br />area from the increased gradient. <br />Well GBB2 is used to monitor the Second White Sandstone aquifer at the GBB <br />site. This well has been influenced by cement contamination. TDS values for well <br />GBB2 have been affected by the cement. The plot of well GBB2 see Figure 4.8-46) <br />should not be used to indicate any changes in the aquifer at this site. <br />A pH of slightly less than 7 to approximately 9 has been observed for well <br />GE3. The pH of well GBB2 has been elevated above the expected value. The pH of <br />water from well GBB2 was in the expected range during the September of 1986 sampling <br />see Table 4.8-10a). At leas[ one casing volume needs to be removed from well GBB2 <br />~ to obtain a field pH [haC is representative of this aquifer, <br />A variation of SAR values from 3.6 to 40 from well GE3 have been observed. <br />Well GBB2 has SAR values of approximately six. <br />ALLUVIAL ApUIFER <br />The alluvial aquifer TDS at well GBB3 has been fairly steady with time see <br />Figure 4.8-47). Only a few TDS data values are available for alluvial well J1. <br />Figure 4.8-48 indicates an increasing trend in TDS for the Johnson Gulch well, <br />Additional monitoring is needed to establish any long-term trends for :this aquifer, <br />The pH of water from well GBB3 has been in the expected range. The variations <br />in pH of water from well GBB3 seem natural. The pH values from alluvial well J1 <br />have been slightly above 7 and seem to be stable. <br />4-233 cc l~~i'dri~!7 ~±f2 1 , `R; <br />