My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE112893
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
200000
>
PERMFILE112893
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:09:09 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 10:01:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/18/1991
Doc Name
DRAINAGEWAY RECONSTRUCTION, Improvement and Repairs 1990
Section_Exhibit Name
Appendix W 1990 Report Section 3.0
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Brush matting (crimping) is essentially a mulch of hardwood brush crimped into erdsting <br />drainage cuts. The technique is employed very effectively in stream channels and on <br />stream banks to protect against accelerated erosion rates when a channel needs repair. <br />Erosion control fabrics, mattings, fibers, strands and soil confinement systems are used <br />effectively in reducing stream velocities and increasing sedimentation in reconstructed <br />drainage channels. Various combinations of materials are used to solve erosion prob- <br />lems on a site specific basis. <br />Erosion control fabrics provide a ground armor that dissipates the energy generated by <br />water movement from run-off or rainfall. Soil retention is a secondary function. Fabrics <br />offering high strength and abrasion resistance are used under rip rap. <br />Erosion control and revegetation matting protects newly-reseeded surfaces until perma- <br />nentvegetation is established. The blankets reduce rainfall impact and run-off velocity, <br />and also enhance plant growth by moderating soil temperatures and reducing evapora- <br />tive moisture losses. Blankets are commonly made of coconut fiber and a synthetic <br />netting material and are sewn together with nylon thread. The natural fibers degrade <br />over tune, but non-degradable synthetic matting materials made of bonded, plastic fila- <br />ments are used for mote permanent applications. <br />Moldable erosion control fibers aze bundles of polypropylene fibers that can be stuffed <br />into rills or gullies and anchored with stakes or staples. T'he bundle slows the velocity of <br />run-off and causes upstream sedimentation, allowing the channel to heal itself and <br />revegetate. <br />• Erosion control strand (roving) is a relatively thick, spaghetti-like yarn that is blown onto <br />an erosion trouble spot or newly-reseeded azea. The 5berglass or polypropylene yarn is <br />tacked to the ground with an asphalt emulsion or similar substance. The mass of fibers <br />slows run-off flow and catches sediment in the spaces between strands. <br />Soil confinement systems generally consist of a series of honeycomb-like cells formed <br />into a spreadable sheet or blanket. Sheets of the material aze anchored and filled with <br />soil, creating a solid, pavement-like surface in areas of poor soil stability. <br />3.4 Improvements and Repairs <br />Drainageway improvements and repairs were performed to provide benefits to all <br />drainages treated in 1987-90, as well as portions of undisturbed drainage segments. <br />Drainage improvements included the installation of several thousand shrub seedlings in <br />1987-89 treatment areas, the rock armoring of a few hay bale structures in 1987 treated <br />drainageways, and dozer basin construction in newly stripped topsoil areas and on <br />regraded spoils. Drainage repairs and enhancement were conducted in all previous <br />reconstructed drainageways (87-89) with a minimum of effort required to complete this <br />task. Essentially no downcutting in drainage bottoms occurred, therefore efforts were <br />directed at reinforcing potential problem areas. <br />Rock structures were installed at an average frequenry of 40-100' throughout the recon- <br />structed Johnson Gulch tributary in 1990. <br />.~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.