Laserfiche WebLink
operational until January 1996. An existing Deninger Pit dewatering well (No. 6) was abandoned in early <br />May. <br />In 1998, topsoil stripping, followed by drill and blast activities, will remove monitoring wells, GA-1 and <br />GA-2. These monitoring wells will not be replaced. See Section 2.5 of this report for further information <br />concerning these two wells. Permit map, M52 will be revised to reflect this change when this TR is <br />approved. <br />2.5 1995 Hydrological Data <br />Hydro-Engineering Inc.'s collation of the 1995 hydrological data for Trapper Mine is submitted as Section <br />2.5, addressing: <br />a. Groundwater Sections 2.0-3.6 <br />(1) Static water level graphs Appendix A <br />(2) Salinity graphs Appendix B <br />(3) Piezometric surtace maps for the major aquifers Maps 2.1-2.3 <br />(4) Water quality Appendix B <br />b. Surtace water Sections 4.0-5.3 <br />(1) Water quality figures and tables Appendix C <br />(2) Flow charts Appendix C <br />(3) Flow vs TSS vs time Appendix C <br />(4) Conductivity vs flow vs time Appendix C <br />• Included with the 1995 Hydrology Report is an index sheet (blue) to keep the basic well data and aquifer <br />information available to the reader. This index is to be used as the reference and also a "bookmark" as <br />the section is reviewed. <br />2.6 Trends <br />Hydro-Engineering's Section 8.0 discusses the observed impacts on the hydrologic systems of Trapper <br />Mine. In general, ground water levels and surface water flows were higher than those observed in 1994. <br />The high precipitation level (148 percent of the historical mean) was the major contributor. Trapper con- <br />tinues to have little if any effect on the local hydrologic regime. <br />2.7 Spoil Spring Sampling (1995) <br />Trapper conducted the annual spoil spring inventory, required by Section 4.8.5.2a, across our mined <br />areas. No new spoil springs were located and none of the existing spoil springs exceeded the five gallon <br />per minute flow criteria. <br />2.8 1995 WET Testing Results <br />In 1995, six drainages had Acute WET tests performed as required by NPDES Permit CO-0032115. <br />NPDES sites 001, 002, 008, 011, 013, and 015. In all cases, the discharge showed no acute toxicity to <br />the test species. Summaries for the tests are enclosed. <br />In accordance with our NPDES permit, only those drainages that may receive pit dewatering are required <br />for WET testing. <br />LWH 3198 <br />~DMG~85REP1l~ <br />