Laserfiche WebLink
GP-8) has shown a declininlnd, stabilizing in recent years with variations over a one foot range. <br />The August, 1994 through August, 1995 net changes are 0.0 ft. and +0.02 ft, respectively. The QR <br />aquifer response (GP-1) has been an overall-decline from-1.990-.to_1995 with variations over an <br />eleven foot range. The water-level elevations declined throughout 1994, followed by overall <br />increases during 1995. The August, 1994 through August, 1995 net change was +2.7 ft. <br />There were several water level increases observed in 1995 that exceed those expected <br />from natural variations and are responses to mine activities. Wells GE-1, GE-2 and 81-03a had <br />water level increases which were probably due to a decrease in dewatering at the adjacent <br />underground mine. Well GMP-1's water level increases are most likely due to a reduction in <br />dewatering at Pit A from an average discharge rate of t0.5 gpm in 1993 to a complete lack of <br />dewatering occurring during ] 994. The majority of dewatering that did occur in 1995 at Pit A was <br />• late in the year and may not show up until sometime in 1996. The water level rises in well GD-3 <br />are possibly due to the moving of Pit D farther from well GD-3. Wells GB-1, GB-2 and GF-5 also <br />had increases in water-level, probably due predominately to mine activities. Mining is moving <br />farther away from these wells with time. <br />Water-level changes will be discussed in more detail in the following section. <br />2.1.2 WATER-LEVEL CHANGES <br />The water-level changes for the period of record are presented as Figures A-1 through A- <br />17 (Appendix A). These are grouped according to aquifer tivhere possible, but in most cases are <br />grouped by similar water-level elevations. This appendix also contains Tables A-1 through A-10, <br />C~ <br />2-3 <br />