Laserfiche WebLink
_. <br />EXHIBIT E (RECLAMATION PLAN) <br />#3 OBJECTION: Applicant has again avoided a commitment to salvaging all top soil <br />possible and has not committed to reclaiming any specific amount of land. <br />#15 STATEMENT: 'Tracks will remain after final reclamation...' <br />08JECTION: The area is not zoned fior a commercial tourist train, and therefor <br />the tracks cannot remain. <br />DEFICIENCY NOTICE CMLRB112 EXHIBIT D (MINING PLAN) <br />STATEMENT: 'There are no sediment ponds and check dams...' <br />CONTRADICTION: Answer to item #10 refers to a "sediment pond at the <br />sandstone quarry" And is then contradicted again in EXHIBIT D 1.3 Last <br />Paragraph "The quarry plant will be started to construct sediment ponds and <br />stormwater berms." <br />EXHIBIT D (PAGE 12) <br />STATEMENT: 'Traffic will use pre-existing road across the stream' <br />OBJECTION: The road referred to was not in existence before exploration of <br />the area by applicant. <br />STATEMENT: 'Installation will ~ to occur during the 5~ months when the <br />stream is dry' <br />OBJECTION: During the past fifteen years I have not seen the Tallahassee <br />Creek dry. Also, any construction involving the wetlands area of Tallahassee <br />Creek must take place and be completed during the colder winter months to <br />avoid the disasterous results that would occur during the flash flooding that warm <br />weather brings. <br />EXHIBIT G (WATER INFORMATION) <br />STATEMENT: Paragraph states that '600 foot distance only applies if open <br />water is planned for the project and that the 600 feet would only apply from the <br />open water to any nearby wells.' <br />OBJECTION: I believe my adjudicated spring can be considered a well. If high <br />sediment wash water is dumpetl Into the applicant's gravel pit It ~~vlll, without <br />doubt, adversely affect this well. <br />EXHIBIT D CMLR6112 (PAGE 12, PARAGRAPH 2) <br />STATEMENT: 'It does not mean that the clear span of each crossing will allow <br />all of the water calculated to come from a 10 year storm event and that larger <br />storm events will probably cause some minimal water to go over the top of the <br />crossings.' <br />OBJECTION: Knowing the area as I do, I believe that storm water going over <br />the crossing structure proposed by the applicant's engineer would simply wash <br />out and be carried into the Arkansas River if storm water goes over the top of it. <br />There have been problems in the past further up river to the west where events <br />similar to the one I just described have occurred. <br />EXHIBIT O (OWNERS OF RECORD) <br />OBJECTION: The 200 foot right of way the applicant is referring to is actually a <br />railroad easement that is measured from the center of the tracks 100 feet to each <br />side of the tracks. My fence is a ground surveyed fence line that is 100 feet from <br />