My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE112009
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
200000
>
PERMFILE112009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:08:26 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 9:04:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2006046
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
10/4/2006
Doc Name
Adequacy Review #2
From
DRMS
To
Banks and Gesso
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Bill Roberts <br />Adequacy Review No. 2, Permit Application No. M-2006-046 <br />October 4, 2006 <br />Rule 6.4.5 Exhibit E -Reclamation Plan <br />12. Based on further review of the soils information provided on the Pre-Mining Plan Map, zero to sixty inches of <br />material suitable for use as topsoil is available for reclamation. Using this range of depths, an average depth of <br />material available for use as topsoil could be estimated to be thirty inches. Therefore, the Division requests that the <br />applicant commit to replacing at least thirty inches of topsoil in order to successfully establish a diverse, effective, and <br />long-lasting vegetative cover as required by Rule 3.1.10. <br />The Division understands that the applicant believes that the construction of Interstate 70 has resulted in the removal <br />of most of this material and that the actual amount of material available for use as topsoil may be less than what is <br />indicated by the USDA SCS. Therefore, the Division requests that the applicant demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the <br />Division, the actual depth of topsoil present on the site. Adequate demonstration might include a soils investigation <br />consisting of either test pits or soil borings and associated test piWoring logs documenting the cun•ent soil profile. <br />Another option might include a detailed plan on how to test and insure that the growth medium will be equal in <br />nutrient value to the existing growth medium. Please respond. <br />13. In the Reclamation Plan, the applicant commits to following the recommendations of the NRCS in order to reestablish <br />vegetation on the site. However, on the Reclamation Plan Map the applicant has added a Plant Schedule consisting of <br />several types of trees and shrubs. The Division appreciates the applicant's effort to establish a diverse vegetative <br />cover with the use of trees and shrubs, but please provide a standazd for the surviving quantity after five yeazs or upon <br />a future release request. <br />Rule 6.4.6 Exhibit F -Reclamation Plan Mau <br />18. Please provide documentation from the owner of the overhead power line to be relocated that relocation of the line <br />has been authorized. <br />Rule 6.4.7 Exhibit G -Water Information <br />19. With respect to the issuance of the TSSP and Well Permit as required by the Office of the State Engineer (OSE), <br />please commit to the following measures: a) Providing the Division with written demonstration of an approved TSSP <br />and Well Permit prior to initiation of de-watering activities at the Silt Pit, and b) Providing the Division with written <br />notice of when de-watering activities have begun at the Silt Pit. <br />20. It is the Division's understanding that no existing wetlands, whether jurisdictional or non jurisdictional, will be mined <br />through during the mining phase and none will be created during the reclamation phase of the Silt Pit. It is also our <br />understanding that there may be jurisdictional as well as non jurisdictional wetlands on site; however, the exact <br />boundaries of these areas have not yet been confirmed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps). Finally, the <br />Division understands that a Corps determination of whether a Corps permit will be needed for the proposed activities <br />has not yet been made. Please confirm if these three (3) assertions are correct. <br />In addition, the Division requests that the applicant provide a written response from the Corps on their evaluation of <br />the applicant's proposed mapping and wetland delineation and whether a Corps permit will or will not be required. <br />Finally, the Division requests that the applicant commit to due diligence in contacting the Corps and obtaining any <br />necessary permits from them upon their finding that a Corps permit is needed. In the event that a Corps permit is <br />needed, the applicant will need to incorporate any changes needed to the approved mining and reclamation plan as a <br />result of the Corps permit. Please respond. <br />21. In accordance with Rule 6.4.7(2)(b), the Division requests that the applicant identify and characterize the aquifer to be <br />mined in or through. Specifically, please provide the following: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.