My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE111962
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
200000
>
PERMFILE111962
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:08:24 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 9:03:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996084
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/2/1997
Section_Exhibit Name
EXHIBIT 05 CULTURAL RESOURCES REPORT 5
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• here, and a shovel probe was excavated into the outhouse pit through the bottom of one of the <br />excavation units. <br />The upper part of Feature 10 is a large, shallow basin, filled with chazcoal and little else (very <br />little soil, no ash). The basin itself has a distinct oxidation rind, indicating that something was <br />burned there, but the chazcoal found in the basin appears to have been dumped from somewhere else. <br />Some artifacts included within the chazcoal aze unburned. The wood that was burned was from a <br />structure; some is cleazly milled lumber. Nails aze common and have been burned, some fused by <br />rust into the charcoal. Many of nails aze bent, suggesting a structure which was dismantled prior to <br />burning, rather than burned standing in place. <br />Below this basin aze relatively clean, but definitely disturbed sediments, which overly the <br />outhouse pit. No attempt was made to excavate the entire pit. Instead, a shovel probe was extended <br />for about a meter into it, reaching what appears to be a point neaz the bottom. The number and type <br />of artifacts found were disappointing, though it is clear that this outhouse pit post-dates the turn of <br />the century and thus does not represent the earliest occupation of the site. <br />The artifacts recovered in Feature 10 include 425 items, of which only 22% come from the <br />outhouse pit itself. Of the 92 pit artifacts, 72 aze vessel glass fragments and most of these aze from <br />a single one gallon jaz that was broken during excavation. Nine of 12 bones or bone fragments come <br />from the outhouse pit, and most notable among these are several chicken lower leg bones, <br />representing more than one individual. One of the bones is from a rooster, retaining the ossified root <br />• of the spur. Artifacts from above the outhouse pit aze neazly all from the charcoal-filled basin, and <br />are mostly nails. Of 149 nails, only one is a cut nail. Forty-seven pieces of newspaper or magazine <br />were found. One piece of debitage is the only representative of the lithic component from this azea. <br />Northern Test Pits. The northern test pits include Test Pits 1, 4, 6 and 8 from the spring, <br />1997 testing effort. No new excavations were conducted here. These test pits aze located in places <br />to the north and east of the Structure 1/Feature 8 complex, and aze, with the exception of Test Pit 1, <br />within the azea of densest surface artifacts. <br />Two hundred forty-nine artifacts were recovered in these excavations (table, Appendix A). <br />Almost 50% of these aze glass fragments. Bone fragments, historic ceramics, and debitage make up <br />the next most common categories. One piece of aboriginal ceramics, three ground stone fragments <br />or tools, and one flake tool aze the balance of the lithic component materials in this azea. <br />Southern Test Pits. The southern test pits include Test Pit 2 from the spring, 1997 testing <br />effort, and three additional 1 sq m excavations from the data recovery phase. The treatment plan <br />proposed one or several squaze meters of excavation at several suspected features in this azea. These <br />excavations failed to produce any evidence of structures. Structures that might have been present, <br />and that were reported to exist by Alphonso Trujillo, may not have been sufficiently substantial to <br />have left indication, especially if they were purposefully moved, removed or destroyed. Artifacts <br />recovered in these excavations were also fairly few in number and generally from shallow contexts. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.