My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE111851
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
200000
>
PERMFILE111851
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:08:19 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 8:56:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
5/1/2003
Section_Exhibit Name
Tab 07 Hydrologic Description
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
156
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• annual mean discharge calculated a higher annual mean for Sage Creek in comparison to <br />Hubberson Gulch, although the drainage area for Sage Creek (7,5 square miles) is smaller <br />than Hubberson Cu lch (8.1 square miles). The higher annual mean determined by the model <br />for Sage Creek is largely due to the fact that Sage Creek has a higher mean basin <br />elevation (2.67) than Hubberson Gulch (2.54). <br />Snowmelt. Snow accumulation in watersheds draining the Seneca II-W Mine can be <br />considerable. Snowpack storage was measured in the Hubberson Gulch watershed by <br />conducting a series of snow surveys during the winter of 1980. The gaging was conducted <br />at 29 stations within the Hubberson Gulch watershed, which was partitioned into 29 areas <br />delineated by Thiessen polygons (see Figure 7-13). Each snow gaging station within each <br />polygon was marked by a steel T-post, and gaging was performed on six occasions between <br />January and March of 1980. The gaging was performed according to standard USDA Soil <br />Conservation Service (SCS) techniques as outlined in Snow Survey and Water Supply <br />Forecasting (USDA-SCS, 1972). <br />Specifically, at each gaging site, a snow sampler was inserted vertically through the snow <br />• until it reached the ground. The depth of the snow was recorded. The snow sampler was <br />then pulled out of the snow and the length of the snow core obtained was recorded. Any <br />soil caught in the end of the snow sampler was removed. Then the snow sampler containing <br />the snow core was weighed. Care was taken to approach each gaging site from the same <br />direction during each visit so as not to compact the snow where future samples would be <br />collected. These data allowed for computation of the snow density and water content at <br />each site on every survey occasion. <br />cable 7-32 presents water contents and volumes determined from the snow gaging data <br />collected at the 29 stations during the winter of 1980, A statistical summary of the data <br />is provided in Table 7-33. The data in Table 7-32 indicate that the water content of the <br />Hubberson Culch watershed increased between February 1 and March 13 to a maximum of <br />approximately 196.31 x 106 fta. The snow wa ter 'content decreased 10 percent by the March <br />27 survey. Maximum snommelt occurred between April 18 and 27, and field observations <br />revealed that all the snow in the watershed, except far a few small, isolated patches, had <br />melted by the end of May. <br />. The Snowpack surveyed during the winter of 1980 in Hubberson Gulch averaged 7.4 inches in <br />water content, and the maximum water content surveyed for this basin was 9.7 inches. <br />95 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.