My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE111698
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
200000
>
PERMFILE111698
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:08:12 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 8:50:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981039
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
page II.J-1 through II.K-4
Section_Exhibit Name
II.J VEGETATION INFORMATION
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />9. Revegetation success criteria jor species diversity and woody plant density <br />are not addressed in the application. Since livestock grazing is the proposed <br />primary post- mining land use, and given the landowner request, shrub reestab- <br />lishment may not be required. This determination will depend on resolution <br />of the issues noted in Section XIII Wildlife of this ietter•. A proposal for <br />evealuating species diversity anti a species diversity standard, as required <br />by Rule 4.15.8(5) must be included in the application. <br />A species diversity success criterion is proposed based on the Colorado <br />Mined Land Reclamation Division's Proposed Policy for Evaluating <br />Species Diversity, as follows: <br />Diversity J~rll be based on cover data. Revegetation will be considered <br />successful if the data demonstrate the presence of at least five peren- <br />~ nisi species with relative importance of at least 3 percent,. with all <br />of these species combined not exceeding 75 percent relative importance, <br />nor any one of these species exceeding 40 percent relative importance. <br />Criteria for woody plant density and diversity are not proposed at <br />this time. <br />5. The primary seed mix, which includes a nu m ber of introduced forage <br />• grasses, including crested wheatgrass, may be appropriate given the land use <br />considerations and landowner request. A concern expressed in the past with <br />regard to Crested wheatgrass is that, when used in a mix with native species <br />it will tend to dominate the stand to the exclusion of other seeded species. <br />This concern is based primarily on research in the northern great plains, <br />but has not been datum ented in northwestern Colorado. The applicant should <br />commit to a revegetation monitoring program which will document the com- <br />petitive relationship among the various species. <br />We agree that not enough is known about the behavior of crested <br />wheatgrass when seeded in mixtures with natives. It is fairly well <br />established that since the palatability of crested wheatgrass is lower <br />than for many other grass species, grazing tends to favor crested <br />wheatgrass establishment at the expense of more palatable species <br />which .are grazed more heavily. Proper grazing management can <br />reduce this trend. <br />Virtually all published research on seeding crested wheatgrass in mixtures <br />deals with mixtures in which crested wheatgrass is a major constituent <br />of the mix. The mixture proposed in the permit application includes <br />crested wheatgrass as a relatively minor constituent. It is included <br />for the following reasons: <br />. It will help stabilize the soil surface and reduce erosion. <br />. It is well adapted to the soils and climate of the area. <br />. it is a reliable germinator. <br />.Its presence will add to the diversity of the reclaimed <br />stand. <br />. It is' nutritious as summer forage. <br />2-85 II.J-23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.