My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE111626
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
200000
>
PERMFILE111626
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:08:07 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 8:47:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/16/1994
Doc Name
1993 Annual Hydrologic Report
Section_Exhibit Name
Appendix W 1993 Report Section 2.5
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The 1992-1993 values for alluvial wells J1 and COY were near <br />neutral. The field pH values for well 81-03a have been near 8.5, <br />while the pH values for the GLOX-1 well are between 7.0 and 8.0. <br />3.4 SAR <br />The sodium-adsorption ratio (SAR) is tabulated on the second <br />series of pages in Table B-1. The SAR values measured for water <br />from well GA1 and GA2 are low with an average value of a few <br />tenths. SAR values for water from well GB2 are typically slightly <br />less than one. The SAR from well GB5 uas typically less than 10 <br />prior to 1985. The last seven years have seen an increase in the <br />SAR value to its 1992 value of 26 and 24 in 1993. <br />The SAR of water from wells GC1, GC2, and GC3 have been <br />typically near 2. No definite trends are shown by the data. <br />The Twenty Mile Sandstone water (well GD1) has had variable <br />SAR values from 0.5 to 4.4. A trend does not exist, but some of <br />the variation could have been affected by the length of pumping <br />prior to sampling. The SAR from well GD2 has generally been close <br />to 0.5. Backfill well GD3 seems to contain water with a similar <br />SAR value. <br />The early SAR values from well GE1 were close to 20, while the <br />more recent values have been close to 12. This change in SAR <br />values could be caused by an increased rate of movement of ground <br />water in this area due to the early drawdowns and recent recovering <br />water levels. These SAR values with the TDS of this water should <br />not make irrigation prohibitive for most soils. SAR values from <br />3-11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.