PERMFILE111528 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

C~~ ~ Petitioner's business. This additional heavy truck traffic will negatively impact Petitioner's customers and employees. l~rallic congestion on Highway 119 and 11,5. Ci is a serious issue and the economic uupacts of sung, tion ul tl+rsr primary routes into and out of [hack 1 L+ttk have been yuunuticd ;uul discussed in several reports produced by the Colorado neparunent of 11'anspurtation. the lileoi: 1 i::wi; liusinrs Intprovcntcnt District, the Silver Dollar ~~Ietropolium Distract, and the ('ity of Black liars k. Adduiunal :,.i;~l'.: I::::~ •nrn shown ro slou busine>, u~affic through Clear C'rrek t anco:; and Furth ('Isar Crrrk (anyuu, and to contrihutr to incrrasrd accidents and a ncg:dive overall perception of safety on these made. Based upon these reports, Petitioner's reasonable business judgment is that the pruposcJ mining operations described in the application will negatively and seriously afTect Petitioner's button; liar and impair I'ctitiuner~s reasonable incesnncnt-hacked expectations. I'rtitioner`s ntanagentrnt has reviewed the potential g:uuin~, traffic intltacts based upon the infotnraion included m the Applicatiuu :ut~t has dcicnninrd that the prub;+ble diversion of ua(lic truth I lighrr:n• 11') :uti! L'.S 6 through the C'rntral City southern access road, decreases in gaming traffic traveling to Black Hawk +tener:dh', and probably shorter gaming time per patron due to pauvn concerns about traveling time, will result in a drop in business based on restrictions on access occurcing in prior years. This economic. loss to the Pctitiuncr also represents an economic loss to the State of Colorado, due to the Slate's loss flue to the decline in rcvcnuc (rum }ost g:nnine taws. 'hhesc arc nut speculative dantagi•s, but instead are bascKl on the prior u•affie sunl~es exprticuced-based pr~~wcuuns ul'Petitioner's management. I'ursu:mt tit C'\4 RR I.d.9, following receipt of this petition for hearing, the C)ffice is rccluirrd to: I I 1 set a dote to consider the application t 21 scLcdulr the application for a fomtal Hea!"Ing before the Board t ~ 1 !>+`"'t<ic atl parurs :u bast Ibu•ty (: U) ria~S written nu+icr of the ~umtal Hearing date 1-t) issue a recumntendatiu^ w the Boani tits approral, approval wlllt eOndlUOnS, or denial .~ Pursu:art to CNIIZI: ?."'.I, the Board may, in its discretion, schedule a Pre-Hearing Conference prior to the formal Hearing. C~1RR 2.7.1(111x) st:ucs, in relevant part, that the Pre- licaring Conference will be held to describe the Oflice's review process, to explain the rights :rod responsibilities of the parties, and to "discuss and resuh'e issues to the extent possible." Pursuant to ('~11:It ~.7.1(el. " ..the Prc-hearing conference shall be held alter the Office has issued +ts tvnttcn rrco:nnwndatiun :utd at (cast ten l I Ol calendar days prior the Furnml Board ! tearing."