My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE111363
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
200000
>
PERMFILE111363
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:07:55 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 8:30:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981018A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
5/13/2002
Section_Exhibit Name
SECTION III MINE DESCRIPTION
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />The NCB subsidence prediction model is recognized as the most accurate and conservative reference <br />available. Although the NCB subsidence prediction model was based on different coal bearing <br />lithology than that found in the U.S., it was used to predict the Deserado Mine subsidence because it is <br />conservative, accurate and widely accepted in the mining industry. <br />The inputs to the longwall subsidence prediction model are depth, mining height (seam thickness) and <br />panel width. Maps 122 and 133 present the overburden and seam thickness isopachs for the D Seam. <br />These inputs plus the panel geometries permitted the calculation of the predictions in Table III-1. <br />Monitoring of the surface above room and pillar mining operations is rarely undertaken; however, data <br />are available from the few surface subsidence-monitoring programs over failed pillars (Table III-2). The <br />subsidence reported is much less than that predicted by the widely used NCB model for longwall <br />mining -the uniform extraction of a thickness of coal across a wide and long area. Maximum <br />subsidence has been reported as little as one-thirty-fifth of the NCB longwall subsidence prediction for <br />50 percent extraction by room and pillar mining. This, no doubt, results from the fact that when pillars <br />fail they crush and expand but do not flatten out uniformly. The shortened crushed pillars increase in <br />load-carrying capacity in some proportion to their increase in cross-sectional area. A cylinder of coal <br />fragments, whose width was 20 times its height, has been capable of supporting 24,000 psi. Likewise, <br />solid coal pillars could never carry such a stress unless their width/height ratio was similarly large. The <br />data presented in Table III-2 permit a statistical analysis of pillar sizes, percent extraction, depth and <br />subsidence for various mines. The maximum predicted subsidence from room and pillar mining is 0.5 <br />feet. <br />III.A.7.d Horizontal Strain Prediction. Horizontal strain, both tensile and compressive, accompanies <br />the lowering of the surface during subsidence. The NCB predicted maximum tensile strains <br />associated with the mining of each section are given in Table III-1. Small hairline cracks of the ground <br />surface normally develop when tensile strains reach 1,000 to 1,500 microstrain. The much larger <br />maximum tensile strains predicted over the longwall panels planned for the Deserado Mine will <br />probably result in the opening of wider cracks at the su ace. Cracks several inches wide should be <br />an ici a e within the zones between the 1,500 microstrain contours presented on Map 131 for the D <br />Seam longwalls. The exact location and actual width of open surface cracks must be considered <br />unpredictable, apparently depending on the type, thickness and jointing of the near-surface strata. The <br />surface soil cover also appears to influence the cracking visible at the surface. The cracks at the <br />surface will tend to fill naturally and rapidly after mining ceases. <br />• Permit Renewal #3 (Rev, 8/99) III-13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.