My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE111363
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
200000
>
PERMFILE111363
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:07:55 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 8:30:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981018A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
5/13/2002
Section_Exhibit Name
SECTION III MINE DESCRIPTION
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• The Staley Gordon Mine, abandoned in 1970, was mined using the room and pillar method. There is <br />no detected subsidence above the abandoned mine although the overburden thickness is less than <br />200 feet and there are large caved areas in the abandoned mine. This indicates that the subsidence <br />caused by small room and pillar sections will have minimal visual impact on the surface. However, the <br />subsidence caused by the abandoned Staley Gordon Mine cannot be compared to the expected <br />subsidence of the Deserado Mine because of its much larger scale of coal extraction. <br />The highest recovery in caved pillar robbing areas of the Staley Gordon Mine was determined from the <br />mine map to be approximately 68%. To calculate the maximum predicted surface subsidence and <br />strain, a more conservative recovery of 75% was used. Using the actual depth of 300 feet at this <br />location and a mining height of 6 feet, a maximum tensile strain of approximately 1700 micro-strains <br />should be produced. This amount of tensile strain probably caused some surface cracks to open up. <br />Since the mining and subsequent subsidence occurred more than ten years ago, normal weathering of <br />the surface would have erased any surface cracking or other visible evidence of subsidence. This has <br />in fact been found to be true; a visual inspection of the surtace over the caved areas showed no <br />surtace cracks, tilted trees or other indications that subsidence had even occurred. <br />III.A.7.c Subsidence Prediction. Predictions of the maximum surface subsidence and horizontal <br />tensile strain for the Deserado Mine D Seam and B Seam longwall panels are presented in Table III-1. <br />Map No. 119 and 120 show the locations of these panels within the mine. These predictions are <br />based on results of subsidence studies made by the U.S. Bureau of Mines and on the model produced <br />by the British National Coal Board. <br />The USBM studies were conducted in underground coal mines having similar geologic conditions as <br />that found in the Deserado Mine. The NCB model is based on 187 subsidence profiles measured <br />across 165 longwall panels. The Deserado Mine subsidence predictions were derived primarily from <br />the British National Coal Board model with input from a model developed by the U.S. Bureau of Mines <br />at the York Canyon Mine. The predictions rely more heavily on the NCB model which is based on 187 <br />subsidence profiles measured across 165 longwall panels. The York Canyon model is based on <br />information collected from only 11 profiles. It is recognized that the British model is for their <br />Carboniferous strata, whereas the Deserado Mine strata is late Cretaceous and Tertiary. The <br />Cretaceous formations found in the U.S. are generally stronger than the British Argillaceous strata. <br />(The Deserado Mine Mesa Verde formation above the coal seam is discussed in the geology section <br />of this application.) <br />• Permit Renewal #3 (Rev, 8/99) III-11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.