My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE111253
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
200000
>
PERMFILE111253
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:07:50 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 8:25:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1998058
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Name
DRAFT HEARING ORDER IN THE MATTER OF JOHNSON EXCAVATION INC PN M-98-058 APPROVAL OF A 112 PERMIT APP
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />under round water flow is not known, the affect of the activities on our water well <br />quality and quantity needs to be addressed more scientifically. <br />1=4. Exhibit H, Wildlife Information. Statements regarding the impact on wildlife made <br />by Elizabeth Ivliller of the DOW were based on running the crusher for a maximum of <br />~} weeks (annually). The actual period of time approved for the crusher operation is <br />set at ~0 days per year or l0 weeks which is considerably loneer than the time she <br />had expected whin she made her impact statement. Anew wildlife impact statement <br />is needed. <br />15. Exhibit N, Source of Legal Right to Enter. The deed attached is irrelevant to this <br />operation. The deed on record does not include ownership rights of minerals. <br />David & Janet Bradley Letter September ??, 1998 <br />16. It is my understanding that wildlife habitat is an issue of the Colorado Division of <br />Minerals and Geology must review and discuss before granting a permit. Although <br />the Division of Wildlife employee Elisabeth Miller was consulted, her comments <br />were based on information which is incorrect. Her statements reflect an impact <br />review based on crusher operation for 4 weeks . The permit applied for allows for <br />more than twice this period of operation (10 weeks). The impact on wildlife habitat <br />needs to be re-evaluated with the accurate operating pazameters before the permit can <br />be issued. <br />Additionat Comment as a result of Informal Conference on October 20, 1998 <br />Diane & Thane Anderson Letter October 23, 1998 <br />17. Comments regazding water quality and quantity to the well were noted in the <br />September 21, 1998 letter and additional comments will be considered. <br />18. If test results show an impact to the quality and quantity of water and a new well must <br />be drilled, what do we do in the meantime? There needs to be an alternate source of <br />water supplied to the home during this time. <br />David & Janet Bradley Letter October 23, 1998 <br />19. It is important that sufficient financial and legal means be in place to ensure the <br />correct day to day operations and long term recovery plans are carried out. The first <br />component in a plan that will achieve this requires a detailed plan for operation and <br />recovery of the proposed mine. The second component requires methods for <br />measuring compliance with its various permits. The third component requires <br />statements of penalties for non-compliance. The fourth component requires <br />itemization of the legal avenues pursuable to provide enforcement. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.