My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1999-01-27_PERMIT FILE - M1999004
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M1999004
>
1999-01-27_PERMIT FILE - M1999004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2021 2:14:26 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 8:20:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1999004
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
1/27/1999
Doc Name
CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS REGULAR 112 OPERATION RECLAMATION PERMIT APPLICATION FORM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINING PLAN <br /> Reclamation Plan (Exhibit E). Subsoil will be stripped separate from the topsoil and will primarily <br /> be used as a backfill material on the quarry side slopes. <br /> In most areas to be mined, the soil is the Curecanti Variant. In only the southern and in <br /> small portions of the western part of Stage 2 does a very different salvageable soil exist (the Nunn <br /> series). This latter soil is a fine grained, clay loam and is easily identified in that few if any trees <br /> grow on the Nunn soils. This soil is not a problem for stripping and stockpiling. In fact, on the <br /> western edge of the affected land there is a large stockpile of this soil that was removed and <br /> stockpiled by the previous operator. <br /> In the northwestern corner and along the mesa edge is another soil (the Roygorge series) <br /> that is probably not salvageable, although there can be small pockets of good soil present in areas <br /> occupied by this series. As a rule this soil is filled with rocks and is a foot or less to bedrock. <br /> Unfortunately, the excellent Nunn clay loam soils constitute a small percentage of all the <br /> soils on the site. The rest of the soil, as stated above, is the Curecanti Variant. The problem with <br /> the Curecanti Variant for salvage and redistribution is the large proportion of moderate to large <br /> rocks present in the soil. Although this soil naturally supports good tree and shrub growth, grass <br /> growth is very limited. Therefore, simple stripping and replacement of this soil may not result in <br /> the kind of vegetation cover needed to produce sufficient grass growth to control erosion. Reliance <br /> on trees and shrubs for erosion control in the initial stages of reclamation is often a serious mistake <br /> because the cover is not sufficient to control both sheet wash and rill/gully formation. <br /> To address this problem with the Curecanti Variant and to create a growth medium more <br /> suited to good grass growth, it is apparent that the rockiness must be reduced. Many of the rocks in <br /> this soil, although subjected to weathering and therefore of somewhat questionable integrity for <br /> high strength uses, would be good for decorative and landscaping purposes. Some of the rock in the <br /> soil could probably be used for riprap. Thus, the larger rocks will be removed from these soils as a <br /> product. This will be done during the salvage process. <br /> Leaving some rock in the soil is beneficial in that it encourages more rapid infiltration of <br /> moisture, less runoff, and provides some of the textural requirements needed for a return of trees <br /> and shrubs to the site. Therefore, most of the smaller rocks will be retained in the soil, as well as <br /> probably some of the larger rocks. If the rock content can be reduced by 30% to 60% as compared <br /> to its natural condition the growth medium should be capable of producing good growth of both <br /> grasses and woody materials. <br /> Soil stockpiling may not be commonly done on this site. The arrangement of the mining <br /> plan will allow much of the soil stripped from one area to be immediately placed on mined out <br /> areas. If stockpiling is done it will occur adjacent to lands that are nearly mined out so the soil can <br /> be replaced at the earliest possible time. Whenever possible, immediate replacement of soil on <br /> mined out areas from new mining areas will be done, as that avoids double handling and greatly <br /> reduces the cost of mining and reclamation. In many mining operations, the cost of stockpiling with <br /> replacement years later is not a significant cost factor. But at this operation, any action that can <br /> reduce operational costs will be advantageous to making this operation profitable. <br /> Salvage of the soil will probably be done with a dozer. A portion of land will be stripped <br /> that will equal the anticipated needs for two years of mining at a time. Soil stockpiling will place <br /> the soil adjacent to the land where it will be used. As stated above, in most cases, soil stockpiling, <br /> if done at all, will be short in duration. Wherever possible, stockpiling will not be done. The soil <br /> will simply be distributed on land ready for reclamation. Topsoil (the neutral upper layers) will be <br /> separated from the lower more alkaline layers (subsoil). The subsoil will either be stockpiled near <br /> an area that will be backfilled or will be placed as fill on quarry side slopes that are ready for final <br /> grading and topsoiling. <br /> Table Mountain Quarry - Castle Concrete Company Exhibit D Page D-5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.