My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE111162
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
200000
>
PERMFILE111162
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:07:45 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 8:17:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988048
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
7/18/1988
Doc Name
ADEQUACY REVIEW CARR GRAVEL RESOURCE ANDESITE ROCK CO FN M-88-048
From
MLRD
To
TUTTLE APPLEGATE RINDAHL INC
Section_Exhibit Name
EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT D MINE PLAN
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Carr Gravel. <br />Water Resources - Exhibit G <br /> <br />- 4 - July 19, 1988 <br />12. What time of year was the drilling of test holes performed? <br />13: What formation are the wells completed in? Are any of these in the <br />near-surface alluvium of Lone Tree Creek? <br />14: Streamfl ow downstream of the mine will not be affected by the operation <br />as proposed. Will any of the surface water rights along the length of <br />the creek in the area of mining, especially Q, R and P noted on the map <br />and table, be affected by changes in runoff drainage pattern during or <br />after mining? <br />Vegetation - Exhibit J <br />15. Although grass species are identified in Exhibit J, no percentage <br />distribution among species (diversity), or percentage ground cover is <br />provided: If the proposed seed mixture is not adopted, please provide <br />this information. <br />Reclamation Costs - Exhibit L <br />16: The inclusion of the cost for hauling topsoil stockpiled from the first <br />cut to the last cut as mentioned on page D-2 was not included. This cost <br />should identify whether scrapers or loader/truck teams will be used. <br />Unit cost should reflect the long haul distance involved: Cost for <br />grading and revegetation should also be included in this item. <br />17: The topsoil respread not accounted for, as noted in comment No.6, needs <br />to be addressed in the reclamation cost estimate: <br />18. The cost estimate assumes three (3) one-half mile passes have been cut as <br />described on page L-1: If the 1:5 acre area of cut is divided by this <br />length, a width of only 8.25 feet results. Is this correct? If not, <br />should the cost for reclaiming a larger initial cut be included in the <br />estimate as a fixed cost as this area will not be reclaimed until mining <br />is completed in each phase? Please clarify. <br />19: No cost for railroad spur demolition has been included. The estimates <br />used by the Division are E8.77 per lineal foot for tie and track <br />removal. Salvage costs may offset part of this: Please comment. <br />20: The cost for grading topsoil; as noted in item 8 of the table and comment <br />No. 8, needs to be addressed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.