My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE111139
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
200000
>
PERMFILE111139
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:07:44 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 8:17:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2003016
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
7/30/2003
Doc Name
Second Adequacy Response
From
Banks and Gesso LLC
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Groundwater Moniiodng and Mitigation Plan for <br />Heit Aggregate Resource Operation-Weld County <br />Aquatic and Wetland Nursery and Coyle Properties <br />(Figure 2). Nursery plants are reportedly irrigated by sub-irrigation from shallow groundwater <br />and by several wells owned by AWC. Concern was expressed by AWC regarding possible <br />impacts on their operation from lowered groundwater levels due to the pit. The Coyles own land <br />southwest of the proposed pit (Figure 2) and reportedly rely on natural sub-irrigation of a pasture <br />by shallow groundwater. They expressed concern with their pasture drying up due to lowered <br />groundwater levels caused by the Heit Pit. <br />Potential impacts on groundwater were assessed in the Mazch 2003 WWE report using the U.S <br />Geologic Survey's (USGS) MODFLOW-2000 computer model. Model boundary conditions and <br />parameters were obtained from USGS reports with data from the late ] 900s. It was assumed that <br />a slurry wall would be constructed that meets state standazds for an impermeable wall. The <br />modeling predicted a slight rise of the groundwater table on the upgradieni side of the proposed <br />pit and a slight lowering on the downgradient side. Approximately 2 feet of drawdown was <br />predicted immediately north of the wall, with 0.5 feet of drawdown approximately 1200 feet to <br />the north, and southeast of the pit. <br />Concern was expressed during the meeting on July 1, 2003 by AWC and Ms. Coyle that more <br />current information was not available for use for the modeling in the March 2003 study. <br />Accordingly, obtaining groundwater measurements for updating the modeling and to assess <br />potential impacts was proposed by the applicant. <br />3.0 PROPOSED MONITORING PLAN <br />Monitoring would be conducted for three purposes: 1) establish pre-mining groundwater levels, <br />2) monitor groundwater levels during operation of the proposed pit to assess whether it was <br />affecting groundwater levels, and 3) provide current groundwater level data that could be used to <br />update the modeling, if necessary. <br />It is recommended that groundwater be measured in several existing wells owned by AWC and <br />the Coyles and in a series of piezometers constructed at key locations. Figure 3 shows the <br />' 021-110.030 Wright Water Engineers, Inc. Page 2 <br />July 2003 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.