My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE110917
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
200000
>
PERMFILE110917
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:07:34 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 8:06:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2004067
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
2/1/2006
Doc Name
MLRB - Board Order
From
MLRB
To
Clear Creek District Water Providers LLC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
withdrawn as parties. Gilpin County announced through its representative that it was <br />withdrawing as a party because it had reached a stipulated agreement with the Applicant <br />concerning unresolved issues. That agreement is set forth in a pleading entitled "Joint <br />Stipulation of Applicant and County of Gilpin Concerning County Permitting <br />Requirements." The contents of the Joint Stipulation were not incorporated into the <br />Board's order. Prior to the Formal Board Hearing, the parties met to attempt to resolve <br />other issues identified in the Boazd's prehearing conference order. As a result of that <br />informal meeting, the Division drafted conditions or stipulations concerning groundwater <br />monitoring, groundwater impacts and blasting. Because all parties did not agree to the <br />proposed conditions, the conditions were not adopted by the Boazd at the time it <br />considered the draft prehearing conference order. The conditions aze set forth in greater <br />detail below. <br />The issues set forth in the prehearing order, as revised, are: <br />(A) Has the Applicant provided Pre-Mining & Mining Plan Maps that accurately <br />show the location of the quarry entrance and all pennanentman-made structures <br />within 200 feet of the quarry entrance (affected Iand)? (Rule 6.4.3 (b} -Exhibit <br />C.) <br />(B) Has the Applicant provided an appropriate blast vibration analysis and blasting <br />plan demonstrating that off-site azeas will not be adversely affected by blasting? <br />At issue aze potential damages to: the Black Hawk/Central City Sanitation <br />District's Waste Water Treatment Plant, sewage lines to the Clear Creek <br />Convenience Store (owned by Clear Creek Convenience LLC), Silver Dollaz <br />MMRR Board Order, M-20114-067 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.