Laserfiche WebLink
in the recording of cultural resources. These areas were well away from <br />the present project area and were not further evaluated. <br />Ttie general prehistoric cultural cer.text of the North Fork Valley <br />has been summarized by archaeologist Flan Reed as part of the State of <br />Colorado's West Central Colorado Prehistoric Context (Reed 1984). The <br />general state of prehistoric knowledge of the reyion is well summarized <br />in the document and will not be repeated herein. In addition to Reed's <br />1954 volume, the reader is also referred to Reed and Scott's 1980 volume <br />(Reed and Scott 1980) which specifically addresses the cultural <br />resources of the Uncompahgre and Gunnison drainages. Another fairly <br />recent analysis of the reyional prehistory is that of Barry Hibbets and <br />his colleagues (Hibbets, et. al. 1979) in relation to the West Central <br />Colorado Coal Leases. In addition to this work by Hibbets and his <br />colleagues, there have been numerous small-scale cultural resource <br />studies in the North Fork Valley. Generally speaking, the results of <br />these various inventories have not provided much new data relative to <br />yaining a better understanding of tine reyional prehistory. <br />Only one project in the Nortf, Furk area has ever been subjected to <br />a "full-blown" E.I.S. level baseline cultural resource study. Tlris is <br />the efi'ur•*. conducted by Centuries Research on behalf of Colorado <br />IJestmOreland's Grchard Valle} 14irie at 1-aonia. Tlris work was coir~inenced <br />in 1976 and continued until 1;136 ~.+hen it culminated in the only <br />substantial excavation cf prehi;~c.ric sit~as :^ the area. The baseline <br />prehistoric data (Baker 19E7) frrn: tf:is substantial effort is probably <br />the best available from tfie regiui, t+s it addresses the regional research <br />• interests outlined by keed (1984). basically, these data show that the <br />foothills above the North Fork contain occasional prehistoric sites. <br />These are not plentiful and are usually small, ephemeral ones which at <br />least span the period from the late Archaic Stage through the Historic <br />Ute Occupation of Western Colorado. Additionally, despite their <br />prominence and potential desirability for prehistoric/aboriginal <br />inhabitants, the cliffs and alcoves above the North Fork seldom yield <br />evidence of human occupation. The cliffs in the project area were not <br />suspected to have much in the way of prehistory. <br />History <br />The history of the North Fork Valley is not well known dnd was <br />badly slighted even in Steven I~~ehls' generally fine history of West <br />Central Colorado (Nehls 198£). The same thing is true for Duane <br />Vanderbusch's history of the Gunnison Lountry (Vanderbusch 1980). <br />Wilson kockwell's local histories still stand as baseline contributions <br />on the North Fork (kockwell 1938, 1938a and 1975). The local history <br />was structured into a usable format for local cultural resource studies <br />by this author as part of the baseline E.I.S. work for the Orchard <br />Valley.htine (Baker 1978). Tlris volume contains some discussion of the <br />town of Somerset which is pertinent to the present project and will be <br />reprinted in part below in reference to the intensive historic <br />development of the North Fork. This development focused on fruit <br />ranching and coal mining. This was as opposed to the earlier extensive <br />development of the local area as part of the primary Euroamerican <br />occupation of tfre Valley. This occupation emphasized stock raising. <br />8 <br />.. y . <br />_ _. .... <br />