My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE110584
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
200000
>
PERMFILE110584
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:07:21 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 7:52:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981032
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
CHAPTER C APPENDIX L REFUSE DISPOSAL FACILITY CORRESPONDENCE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 4 <br />Jim Herron <br />July 23, 1980 <br />input material parameters, as shown on figures 13.3.2 and 13.3.3, assume <br />the waste material density has 106pcf, and the existing colZuvial soil's <br />material density as Z20pcf. The applicant's consultant must verify the <br />appropriate nature of these material property assumptions in order to <br />utilize them within the stability analysis. Such a verification should <br />include field or laboratory testing to demonstrate that the assumed <br />density values appropriately model the proposed disposal fill. Without <br />this verification, the stability analysis cannot be considered representative <br />of the proposed disposal fill. If the applicant's consultant cannot <br />verify and justify the use of the density values utilized in calculating <br />the factors of safety presented in the application, the stability analysis <br />will have to be repeated and the application amended to show the correct <br />results. <br />Pseudo-Static Stability Analysis <br />Page 13-9 states that the pseudo-static stability analysis incorporated <br />a horizontal force of 0.025g to simulate the effect of an earthquake on <br />the stability of the proposed waste disposal pile. The applicant's <br />consultant should justify this assumption which is significantly lower <br />than the acceleration factors assumed in several recently prepared <br />pseudo-static analyses for mines within the same region. <br />Certification and Inspection of the Disposal Fi11 <br />The application contains no reference to certification or inspection of <br />the proposed development waste fill. Northern Coal will have to supply <br />the Division the inspection and certification by a registered professional <br />engineer, as specified in section 30 CFR 817. 71(j). As mentioned above, <br />the company should also provide the Division with verification of the <br />durability of the waste material deposited within the fill. The zeguired <br />certification should include at least quarterly verifications of the <br />durability of the fill materials. The application should be amended to <br />reflect these inspections and certification requirements. <br />CC: Fred Banta <br />/k <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.