Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. (SA and 58) Ponds 2 and 3. <br /> <br />Response (5A and 5B~ Rockcastle proposes to remove Ponds 2 and <br />3 and reclaim the associated disturbance areas so no response is <br />~~ <br />necessary. <br />6) (4/24/91 CMLRD Letter, Page 4, Question 19). Provide a schedule to <br />install and reclaim to a 3:1 backslope the area east of Pond 4 this summer <br />per the October 8, 1990 submittal. Document the remaining material <br />balance required to achieve reclamation of Pond 4. <br /> <br />Response (61: Scheduling, design, and material balance information <br />for reclamation of the steep slope adjacent to Pond 4 and associated <br />pond modifications has been provided in the previous Pit 4 adequacy <br />response submittal. <br />2) Please repair all pond inlet areas which have been damaged by downcuttin~ <br />as previously requested. <br />Response: This comment repeats the concern previously noted in (Pit <br />1 /2/3), Comment 1(4A-1 through 4D-1). Please see the corresponding <br />response. <br />3) The operator has previously committed to reclamation of Pond 3. Please <br />provide a schedule for this work <br />Response: Contingent on timely review and receipt of required <br />Division approvals, Rockcastle plans to initiate and complete <br />reclamation of Pond 3 during the remainder of 1991. <br />• 4) Once the pond removal de»tonstrations are complete, it is preferable tltut all <br />ponds be removed. If the operator still intends to leave Pond 2 (and Pond <br />-10- <br />