My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE110064
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
200000
>
PERMFILE110064
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:06:59 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 7:29:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 15 Subsidence Prediction
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
He concludes that, <br />"Differential movement on the fault plane can be caused by the first workings <br />near the fault. If the coal is only taken from one side of the fault the angle <br />of draw can be greatly reduced, but with workings in more than one position <br />the normal angle of draw is likely to be observed. Once differential <br />movement has occurred, further workings in the area cause renewed <br />movement which is sometimes out of all proportion to the thickness and <br />extent of the extraction. The likelihood of movemenl is not influenced by the <br />depth of the seam but mainly by the position of the face." <br />He also observed that when the coal is mined out close to the fault at mine level, <br />the step on the surface will extend over the full width and not far past the extracted area. <br />And the prediction of the step height should only be done when the workings are <br />underneath the fault plane and on the upthrow side of the fault. <br />From this analysis it could be postulated that in the Bowie #2 Mine, regardless of <br />the depth, when a fault is encountered and coal is mined beneath the fault plane on the <br />upthrow side of the fault a step on the surface could result with a maximum height of <br />approximately (0.33) X 4.9' = 1.6' extending over and slightly past the retreated room and <br />pillarworkings. One could also speculate that the rate of subsidence would be accelerated <br />due to the increased vertical pillar strain on development pillars. <br />The First North Mains mined into the fault in late 1997 or early 1998. The fault is <br />characterized as a shear fault as opposed to a roll fault and little or no goaf was <br />encountered. The fault trace was virtually dry. <br />The rock entries and raises should be supported to assure any debris within the fault <br />plane is supported in place and not allowed to cave or flow into the mine. Roof support <br />may include additional bolting, steel sets, steel sets with lagging and fill above the steel <br />sets to assure fault debris is supported and contained. <br /> <br />- 17 - 10/00 <br />P2-o y <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.