My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE109665
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
100000
>
PERMFILE109665
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:06:42 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 6:41:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981022A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
Revised and New SAEs and Alternative Sediment Controls (ASCs)
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 2.05-E3 Section 9
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SLOPE2SAE <br />During the construction of [he Elk Creek Mine pad areas, slopes will be created which will grade down to <br />the Elk Creek. The slopes are labeled Slope 1 and Slope 2 and are shown on the Drainage and Sediment <br />Control Plan (Map 2.05-M4). Slopes 1 and 2 occupy 0.33 ac. and 0.14 ac., respectively. Due to the small <br />area affected by the Slope 2, conventional drainage and sediment control measures are no[ necessary. <br />Oxbow proposes alternative sediment control measures [o control erosion from the Slope 2 area. Final <br />grading will leave the slopes in a roughened condition. As soon as final grading of the slopes is complete, <br />Slope 2 will be seeded with the previously approved interim seed mixture and covered with a straw mulch <br />a[ an application rate of 1 [on per acre. Therefore, the slope will be in a disturbed condition for a relatively <br />short time. A silt fence, constructed of straw bales instead of fencing, will be placed and anchored along <br />the contour a[ the bottom of [he slope. The SEDCAD4 silt fence utility was used to model water quality <br />from [he runoff resulting from the 10-year, 24-hour storm. A flow rate of 5.6 gpm/sq. ft. was input to [he <br />model to represent straw bales. The flow rate was obtained from Barfield (1978). The use of svaw mulch <br />tackifiers and straw bales is commonly used [o control erosion on small out-slopes such as these throughout <br />[he United States. <br />The following calculations demonstrate that the straw bales will treat the runoff from [he design storm. <br />~droloav Inuuts <br />The curve number (CN) assigned to the topsoil stockpile was indicative of a C subsoil (poor). A 60-day <br />period after seeding and mulching [he slopes was assumed. <br />Interim Reclaimed <br />Watershed Area: 0.14 ac. <br />Soil Type: C <br />Ground Cover: 60-day interim reclamation/straw mulch <br />Cover Type: Poor <br />CN: 87 <br />K Factor: 0.37 <br />C Factor: 0.26 (Slope roughened, Poor veg, tackifier- 60 days) <br />P Factor: 1.0 (No additional mechanics] controls) <br />All other hydrology inputs are shown on the attached SEDCAD4 computer printouts. <br />Hydrolo¢v Results <br />Runoff volume: 0.017 ac. ft. (751 cu. ft.) <br />Water Quality: 0.5 mUl <br />Based on [he small size of the area, establishment of interim vegetation and mulching, and Oxbow's ability <br />to effectively meet water quality standards with straw bales, an SAE is requested for the Slope 2 area. <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.