My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE109665
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
100000
>
PERMFILE109665
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:06:42 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 6:41:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981022A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
Revised and New SAEs and Alternative Sediment Controls (ASCs)
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 2.05-E3 Section 9
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• SLOPE 1 SAE <br />During the construction of [he Elk Creek Mine pad areas, slopes will be created which will grade down [o <br />the Elk Creek. The slopes are labeled Slope I and Slope 2 and are shown on the Drainage and Sediment <br />Control Plan (Map 2.05-M4). Slopes I and 2 occupy 0.33 ac. and 0.14 ac., respectively. Due [o [he small <br />area affected by Slope 1, conventional drainage and sediment control measures are not necessary. <br />Oxbow proposes alternative sediment conVOl measures to control erosion from the Slope 1 area. Final <br />grading will leave the slope in a roughened condition. As soon as final grading of the slopes is complete, <br />Slope 1 will be seeded with [he previously approved interim seed mixture and covered with a sVaw mulch <br />at an application rate of 1 [on per acre. Therefore, the slope will be in a disturbed condition for a relatively <br />short time. A silt fence, consVUC[ed of hay bales instead of fencing, will be placed and anchored along the <br />contour a[ the bottom of [he slope. The SEDCAD4 silt fence utility was used to mode[ the water quality <br />from [he runoff resulting from the 10-year, 24-hour storm. A flow rate of 5.6 gpm/sq. ft, was input to the <br />model [o represent straw bales in lieu of a silt fence. The flow rate was obtained from Bartield (1978). The <br />use of straw mulch and sVaw bales is commonly used to control erosion on small out-slopes throughout the <br />United States. <br />The following calculations demonstrate that [he straw bales will treat the runoff from the design storm. <br />Hvdroloev Inputs <br />The curve number (CN) assigned to the topsoil stockpile was indicative of a C subsoil (poor). A 60-day <br />period after seeding and mulching the slopes was assumed. <br />Interim Reclaimed <br />Watershed Area: 0.33 ac. <br />Soil Type: C <br />Ground Cover: 60-day interim reclamation/straw mulch <br />Cover Type: Poor <br />CN: 87 <br />KFactor. AFC 0.037 . 3~ .~., sGdcA~ <br />C Factor: 0.26 (Slope roughened, Poor veg, tackifier-60 days) <br />P Factor: 1.0 (No additional mechanical controls) <br />All other hydrology inputs are shown on [he attached SEDCAD4 computer printouts. <br />Hvdrolo¢v Results <br />Runoff volume: 0.025 ac. ft. (1,089 cu. ft.) <br />Water Quality: 0.5 nd/I <br />Based on the small size of [he area, establishment of interim vegetation and mulching, and OMI's ability [o <br />effectively meet water quality standards with straw bales, an SAE is requested for the Slope 1 area. <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.