Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Page 9 <br />December 7, 1987 <br />M-S7-171 Adequacy Responses <br />Steven Renner <br />So, it appears that the use of the water in this operation would probably <br />not be proper at this time. Of course, the water will still be used for <br />stock watering so long as grazing continues on the land east of the <br />operation and west of the interstate. Water for this operation will <br />therefore be obtained by agreement from other parties, unless the spring <br />is investigated more thoroughly in the future and it is found to be of <br />proper use rights. In that case, it would probably be used as a <br />contribution to the water budget for the operation. <br />QUESTION 4: The staff has found that a crimped mulch application (such as <br />air~lried straw) not only resists wind erosion, but greatly enhances the <br />organic matter content of replaced topsoil and helps to protect seed from <br />foraging wildlife. The Division suggests that the operator evaluate <br />crimping two tons of air-dried straw per acre subsequent to seed <br />application. <br />RESPONSE: We are familiar with the merits of mulches in revegetation. <br />However, those merits do not come without some significant problems. The <br />use of a mulch to retard wind erosion can work well, but is probably no <br />more effective than ridging at right angles to the strongest expected <br />winds. We feel that the use of mulch in protecting seed from foraging <br />wildlife is subject to question. Straw mulch might have this effect, but <br />other mulches which do not exhibit the biological problems of straw <br />certainly would attract wildlife as a food source. It is a matter of <br />straw vs. hay. <br />The greatest problem with mulch is the aspect of adding organic matter <br />to the soil. Although straw certainly would add significant amounts of <br />organic matter, straw is primarily a high carbon source. If the soil, as <br />is generally true of acid and semi-arid soils, already exhibits a <br />somewhat unfavorable carbon/nitrogen ratio, then the addition of more <br />high carbon material simply makes the soil less capable of producing <br />desirable growths. The carbon/nitrogen ratio, which should ideally be at <br />about 20:1, is very important in producing adequate fertility. When the <br />ratio exceeds about 50:1, which can very easily occur when carbon based <br />mulches are used, the nitrogen fertility of the soil can be severely <br />affected and production will decrease markedly. In order to counteract <br />this problem, additional amounts of nitrogen fertilizer can be added to <br />help in the decomposition of the carbon material. Unfortunately, such <br />additions of nitrogen fertilizer do not always work well in acid lands <br />where decomposition is exceedingly slow in the first place. Often the <br />nitrogen is lost to the atmosphere before significant decomposition can <br />occur and nitrogen deficiency resulting from an unfavorable <br />carbon/nitrogen ratio can still reduce production. This is one of the <br />advantages of hydromulch - the mulch particles are smaller and decompose <br />more rapidly. Unfortunately in acid lands hydromulch can actually make a <br />revegetation project fail through its wicking action which draws rater <br />out of the soil; water that may already be in a severe deficit. <br />