My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE109627
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
100000
>
PERMFILE109627
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:06:40 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 6:36:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/25/2003
Section_Exhibit Name
NH2 Section 2.05.6(3) Protection of the Hydrologic Balance
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• f) Impact of spoil water quality on surface water quality. <br />Spoil Water Quality <br />The chemistry of the water interacting with the spoil is described in the previous section. In order to <br />determine the impact of the spoil water quality on the surface water, it is first necessary to predict the <br />expected quality of the spoil leachate for the New Horizon #1 and #2 mines. The principal impact from <br />a quality perspective is that irrigation water will seep rapidly through the spoil, increase in TDS and <br />then discharge through a spoil spring at each mine area. Since the pre-mine site did not have spoil <br />springs, there is a potential impact to the quality of the receiving waters. The spoil spring at the New <br />Horizon #1 Mine enters Tuttle Draw while the predicted spring for the New Horizon #2 Mine will enter <br />a tributary to Tuttle Draw and within 1 mile, will also enter Tuttle Draw. Increases or decreases in pH <br />have never been observed on the site. The Spoil Spring 1 discharge best represents the quality of the <br />spoil leachate at the New Horizon #1 Mine, since this flow is solely of water emanating from the spoil <br />and has very little surface water influence. The NPDES 001 discharge is comprised of the flow from <br />Spoil Spring 1, a second spoil spring above a tributary drainage and very rarely, surface flows. From <br />samples of Spoil Spring 1 discharge over the past 12 years, an expected average TDS is 3300 ppm <br />TDS, which is approximately 6% higher than average levels in the overburden samples taken over the <br />same period. Since the New Horizon #2 Mine is larger and has a longer flow path through the spoil, it <br />• is estimated that TDS levels will be 10% higher than average levels in the overburden, resulting in a <br />TDS of 3425 ppm. <br />Timeframes of Elevated TDS in Sooil Water <br />The time period that these slightly elevated level of TDS in the spoil water and spoil spring discharges <br />is difficult to calculate. In 1994, the USGS did a detailed study of the impacts of infiltration into spoil at <br />the Seneca II Coal Mine in Routt County, CO. This study is Water Resources Investigations Report 92- <br />4187 titled Hvdroloav and Geochemistry of a Surface Coa! Mine in Northwest Colorado. Lysimeters <br />were installed to measure infiltration rates into the spoil, and samples of inflow water, spoil water and <br />spring discharge were analyzed for the entire area. It was determined that pyrite oxidation was the <br />principal cause of elevated TDS, and that the percent of pyrite in the spoil was the determining factor <br />in the length of time that the TDS would be elevated in the spoil water. A spoil pyrite content of 1 % by <br />weight, for example, was predicted to fully oxidize in 1600 years (their Table 18). TDS levels in the <br />spoil water were approximately 4500 ppm, which was a significant increase overthe overburden aquifer <br />water in the area. The coal mine overburden at this site was similar in age to that of the New Horizon <br />Mine. <br />• (Revised 6/01) 2.05.6 (3) - 33 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.