Laserfiche WebLink
• . page 3 <br />Oct. 6, 1983 <br />Peter O'Connor <br />Chieftain Nine <br />The soil tests also show that there are no especially adverse <br />materials in the spoil or spoil soil mixtures already occurring <br />on the mine and this material can be used effectively on the pit <br />bottom xhere development is more rapid and moisture not such a concern. <br />It needs to be pointed out, also, that the placement of "4 to 5 <br />inches" os soil on a slope is logistically very difficult, The kind <br />of equipment used in topsoil salvage and redistribution is not that <br />accurate. On slopes it is hard to even achieve a t 2 inch accuracy. <br />We have to disagree with your suggestion of changing the plan. <br />The plan was conceived on some sound ecological judgement and <br />altering it, we feel, would cause difficulties 1n revegetation, <br />EXHIBIT E - RECLAMATION PLAN. ITEM 2; <br />We completely disagree with your proposed seed mixture for several <br />reasons. First, our plan calls for revegetating both soil and spoil <br />or spoiljsoil mixtures, and as already stated we do not intend to <br />change that for good reasons. <br />Second, your mixture calls for the use of two species, in <br />particular, which are undesirable in several respects. First, Needle- <br />and-Thread (St1pa comata is a species that readily invades disturbed <br />areas, is already there, and will undoubtedly carryover in the soil <br />in more than sufficient quantities. Also this species is rarely <br />planted because it has undesirable characteristics in range land. It can <br />cause an irritation in the mouths of domestic stock. As a result, <br />it is virtually impossible to obtain and what is available is horribly <br />expensive. Furthermore, the species is primarily adapted to more <br />sandy soils and does not do well in clays. In our opinion, its <br />use on this site is clearly inappropriate. <br />Arizona Fescue, on the other hand, is a very useful species Sn <br />range lands, grows on a wide variety of soils, but prefers well drained <br />sites and soils, and is very drought resistant. Unfortunately, it <br />also exhibits great ecotypic variation and acquiring adapted ecotypes <br />is very important. Because of this characteristic it is not used <br />very much except in specific locations and therefore the demand Ss <br />low, availability low, and price very high. According to some seed <br />suppliers, they do not recommend planting the species because of <br />its poor success rate. I recall a number of years ago some of the <br />major loxland permits issued contained revegetation plans that <br />proposed using this species. To the best of my knowledge, this species <br />has been dropped from most of them and other species substituted. <br />In summary, we will not include either of these species in our <br />mixtures for this mine. <br />What you say about winter wheat is generally true. It can be a <br />problem. But it can also be very useful. In revegetating road cuts <br />with 1.5:1 slopes its value in filling that critical gap during the <br />first groxing season xhen the other species are too small to control <br />erosion far exceeds the problems St creates, IF it is used at rates <br />of 4 pounds per acre or less. On areas where the wheat distribution <br />exceeds that rate, due to normal variations in seed distribution xhen <br />broadcasting steep slopes, it does tend to retard some of the other <br />plants. billing keeps this to a minimum if the slopes permit drilling. <br />