My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE109565
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
100000
>
PERMFILE109565
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:06:37 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 6:29:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1981148
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
10/24/1983
Doc Name
RESPONSES TO ADEQUACY LETTER CHIEFTAIN MINE FN 81-148
From
MARK A HEIFNER
To
MLR
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• iii iiiiiii~iiiii ~~i ,, <br />MARK A. HEIFNER <br />37 East Colorado Avenue <br />Denver CO 80210 <br />1303) '722-9067 <br />October 6, 1983 <br />Peter V. O'Connor, <br />Reclamation Specialist <br />Mined Land Reclamation <br />Rm. 423 Centennial Bldg. <br />1313 Sherman St. <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />environmental services <br />botanical studies <br />photography <br />9~ECE6VED <br />OCT 2 41983 <br />RE: Responses to adequacy letter, Chieftain Mine MINED LAND RECLAMATION DiV1Si0N <br />Your File Ho. 81-148 Colo. Dept. of Natural Resources <br />Dear Mr. O'Connor: <br />I have been asked to respond to some of the points you have raised in <br />your adequacy letter, dated September 29, 1983. Following are my <br />responses to those questions primarily regarding the reclamation plan <br />and soil salvage and storage. <br />Exhibit D -Mining Plan, Item 1: <br />We agree that the seeding rate is little bit on the low side and <br />agree to adjust the rate to the S.C.S, recommended rate. However, we <br />believe that Slender Wheatgrass should not be substituted for Fairway <br />Crested Wheatgrass. <br />Standard Crested Wheatgrass would not be wise to use, but Fairway <br />Crested Wheatgrass exhibits somewhat different characteristics. It Ss <br />fairly drought resistant and equal to Slender Wheatgrass in this respect. <br />It tends to develop somewhat more rapidly than Slender Wheatgrass or <br />Intermediate Wheatgrass. It also tends to be less bunchy than Slender <br />Wheatgrass or Standard Crested Wheatgrass (that is the reason it is <br />used on golf course fairways -hence its name . On the whole, as a <br />species useful in stabilizing topsoil stockpiles, we feel it is <br />preferable to Slender Wheatgrass. <br />It is true that some carryover into the final vegetation can be <br />expected and this would be of great concern Sf the more vigorous <br />competer Standard Crested Wheatgrass were used on the stockpiles. <br />However, the Fairway variety should not produce the problems the <br />Standard variety xould probably produce. <br />It must also be pointed out that this same mixture has been approved <br />for identical uses on other Robinson Brick Company mines. In the <br />interest of efficiency it is much more convenient to limit the variety <br />of seed mixtures a company needs when they operate multiple: mines <br />that have similar soil and environmental characteristics. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.