My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE109368
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
100000
>
PERMFILE109368
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:02:07 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 6:09:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980005
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/27/2007
Doc Name
Historical Approaches to Testing Reclaim Adeq for PIII Bond Release
Section_Exhibit Name
Tab 13 Appendix 13-15
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• liability period, and the length of time for successional processes to act upon the recLamed <br />community. <br />r1 <br />~J <br />Observations in reclaimed areas indicate these aeeas have the potential to be more representative of <br />the native sagebrush type rather than the mixed brush type. Monitoring data supports these <br />observations to some extent The number of perennial species with relative cover greater than three <br />percent in the sagebrush reference area is eight three forbs, three grasses, and two shrubs (1991 <br />monitoring data). Representative reclaimed area monitoring data from 1991 (Wadge Pasture) shows <br />eight perennial species occur with greater than one percent relative cover. three forbs, foot grasses, <br />and one shrub. Although dues percent relative cover was selected for the sagebrush reference area, a <br />one percent relative cover value for the reclaimed azea is more representative of this community's <br />early successional status. The above comparison represents a general pattern of similarity. A <br />comparison between data for the mountain brush reference azea and the reclaimed azea did not <br />reflect a similar pattern due to the strong influence of that type's woody component and, to a lesser <br />degree, perennial forb component <br />The diversity standazd for the Seneca R Mine is as follows. <br />- Five perennial forbs with greater than 50 percent frequency; one perenttialfo~b will each have <br />greater than 3% relative cover and two perennial forbs will each have relative cover greater than <br />1 percent. These forbs will not have greater than 40 percent relative covet each. <br />- Six perennial grasses with greater than 50 percent frequency; two perennial grasses will each <br />have greater than 1 percent. These grasses will not have greater than 40 percent relative covet <br />each. <br />- Three shrubs with greater than 5 percent frequency; one shrub will have relative cover greater <br />than 1 percent <br />- Combined relative cover of the three forbs and four grasses will not exceed 80 percent <br />NOTE: Frequency is defined as the number of samples in which the speaes was present divided by <br />the total number of samples. <br />I • <br />Additionally, species density, or the total number of spedes per 100 m2 plot, in the reclaimed areas <br />will be greater than or equal to 20. Species density data will be collected during cover sampling with <br />the 100 m2 plot oriented on the cover transect <br />TR-40 t3-15<t <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.