My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE109316
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
100000
>
PERMFILE109316
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:02:03 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 6:05:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982054
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
7/12/1988
Doc Name
Letter on Permit Expiration & Gravel Operation
From
MLRD
To
PUEBLO COAL INC
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
_ r <br />• iii iuiiiiiuiiiiu • <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />Roy Romer, Governor <br />DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />FRED R. BANTA, Director <br />July 12; 1988 <br />Mr, Jim Hendricks <br />Pueblo Coal, Inc. <br />278 Sawyer Drive; Suite lA <br />Durango, Colorado 81301 <br />RE: Carbon Junction Mine <br />FILE: C-82-054 <br />Dear Mr. Hendricks: <br />The purpose of this letter is two-fold. First, to remind you that the current <br />permit term for the Carbon Junction Mine expires on October 25, 1988. We urge <br />you to submit an application for renewal as outlined by Rule 2.08.5(2) as soon <br />as possible. At this point, should a permit renewal not be issued by the <br />expiration date of October 25, 1988, Pueblo Coal could not conduct any mining <br />operations (other than maintenance) until the renewal is issued, If a <br />complete application is not made prior to the permit expiration date, the <br />current permit would expire leaving reclamation as the mandated course of <br />action. Attached please find a renewal application form. We will be <br />available to assist you in its completion if necessary. <br />which were required to be addressed prior to resumption of active status could <br />be delayed for some additional period of time, but we have not looked into <br />this issue in detail. <br />Second, we have reviewed your letter of June 14, 1988, regarding the <br />possibility of starting a gravel mining operation on the excess overburden <br />disposal area. Your request is not without precedent and it would appear that <br />a gravel mining permit might not be necessary. However, operations and <br />reclamation would have to comply with the requirements of the coal law and the <br />temporary cessation status of the mine would be lifted during the gravel <br />operation. It is possible that resolution of certain of the stipulations <br />We do not have sufficient information at this point regarding details of the <br />operation, including anticipated duration and volume of gravel to be removed <br />to indicate to you whether or not the operation would be approvable. One <br />obvious concern we have is the effect removal of the excess spoil material <br />would have on the achievement of approximate original contour (AOC). We would <br />require a demonstration that sufficient spoil would remain after completion of <br />the gravel operation to achieve AOC if the existing pit were to be reclaimed. <br />215 Centennial Building, 1313 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 80203-2273 Tel. (303) 866-3567 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.