Laserfiche WebLink
<br />E?CHIBIT L (Rule 6.3.12): Evidence was presented in Exhibit G that the Allens own the MY I/4 and SE'/, <br />of Section 7. As referenced under the Exhibit E discussion and indicated on the copy of the soils map in the Lincoln <br />County pit file, there is or was a fence along an irtegular line separating properties in the NV/'/, and NL'/, of <br />Section 7, i.e. separating property indicated to be owned by the Allens and property whose ownership may not have <br />been established. <br />Please confirm that there is nu fence along the line indicated on the copy of the map provided. If there is, <br />indicate whether this fence lies within 200 feet of the proposed boundary of the permit/affected land. If there is a <br />fence and it does lie within 2W feet of the proposed boundary of the pit, please identify the owner and, if it is not <br />the Allens, satisfy the requirements of [his Rule by either providing a notarized agreement to compensate the owner <br />in the even[ of damage to the structure or provide an engineering evaluation that demonstrates that such structure <br />shall not be damaged by activities associated with the mining operation. <br />NOTE: The decision date for this application is May 12, 2000. Please respond fully to the above indicated <br />adequacy issues enough in advance of that date that the Division will have time to review the response, deal <br />with any remaining issues and consider approval at that time. If you cannot fully respond by that time, <br />please provide a written waiver of your right to a decision on May 12, 2000 in order to avoid a denial of the <br />application and to allow the permitting process to continue. <br />If you have any questions on the above, please contact me. <br />Sincerely, <br />~la~ c~,,tv,~ <br />James C. Stevens <br />Sr. Specialist <br />Enclosures <br />