My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE109153
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
100000
>
PERMFILE109153
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:01:38 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 5:53:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2000050
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
4/25/2000
Doc Name
BROKEN SPEAR PIT FILE M-2000-050 RESULTS OF ADEQUACY REVIEW OF 110 PERMIT APPLICATION
From
DMG
To
BARNHART AGENCY INC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~ III IIIIIIIIIIIII III ~ <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1 313 Sherman 51., Roam 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80207 <br />Phone: 1303) 866-3567 <br />FA%:007)832-8106 <br />April 25. 201N) <br />Mr. Joe Gagliano <br />Barnhart Agency.lnc. <br />12 W. 13'" St. <br />Pueblo. CO 81003 <br />RE: Broken Spear Pit (File M X000-050) Results of adequacy review of 110 permit application <br />Dear Mr. Gagliano: <br />Bill Owens <br />Covermr <br />CreG F. ev.,lcne~ <br />Etecuove Director <br />Michael B. Lung <br />Division D~recror <br />The Division has reviewed the permit application for the Broken Spear Pit (File M-2000-050) and has identified the <br />following adequacy concerns: <br />NOTICES (Rule 1.6.2): The application contains evidence that notices of the application have been sent to <br />the Lincoln County Board of Commissioners and the Board of Supervisors of the High Plains Soil Conservation <br />District. There is also evidence that the required notice of the proposed mine has been posted at the mine site and <br />[hat a copy of the application has been filed with [he Lincoln County Clerk. Although there is some question about <br />the proximity of the pit to property owned by other than the applicants (See issues identified under Exhibits A and <br />E.), there is no evidence in the application that notices of the application have been sent to all possible owners of <br />record of surface lands within 200 feet of the permit/affected land boundary. The Division has been advised that <br />there will be some delay in the publication of the newspaper notice which the Division agrees is appropriate. Such a <br />delay will, however, extend the end of the 10-day comment period but possibly not the current decision date of <br />May 12, 2000. <br />Prior to [he May 12, 2000 decision date for the application, the Division must be provided with evidence <br />of the receipt of notices of the application by Lincoln County, the High Plains Soil Conservation District, by any <br />owner of record (other than the Allens) of surface land within 200 feet of the permiUaffected land boundary as well <br />as evidence of the publication of the newspaper notice of [he application. <br />PERFORMANCE AND FINANCIAL WARRANTIES: Although approval of the permit application may <br />be secured without submittal of acceptable performance and financial warranties, a reclamation permit cannot be <br />issued without such instruments being in place. Neither a performance warranty nor a financial warranty were <br />submitted with the permit application for the proposed Broken Spear Pit. <br />A blank performance warranty form is attached to this review for your use. Since the estimated 59,671.00 <br />cost of reclamation included in the application is acceptable to [he Division, please notify the Division the type of <br />financial warranty intended to be used and the Division will send you the proper form(s). <br />EXHIBIT A (Rule 6.3.1 (2)): Although the Exhibit E-Mining Plan Map indicates that the Allens own the <br />property "all around the pit', this does not clearly eliminate the possibility that there still may be adjacent owners of <br />record of surface land within 200 feet of the permit/affected land boundary. According to the copy of the deed <br />supplied in Exhibit G, the Allens own only the NW'/. and SE'/s of Section 7 and the permit area represented on the <br />Exhibit A and Exhibit E maps is very close to or may even extend into the NE'/a SW '/. of the section. It is the <br />Division's opinion that the boundary between [he NW '/+ and SW '/. would be marked, as is the usual case, by an <br />EW line extending From the center of the section marked by the large figure 7 and not the line identified as UTM <br />4368000N. (Please also see discussion under Exhibit E.) <br />There are a number of complications and requirements [hat may be involved here. To begin with, please <br />indicate if the proposed permit area is intended to be limited to the SE'/. NW '/. of Section 7 and, if so. indicate if it <br />lies over 200 feet from the boundary with the SW '/< of Section 7, i.e. that the Allens own all the property within <br />D I VISION O F <br />MINERALS <br />GEOLOGY <br />FOR YOUR CORRESPONDENCE FIIE R E C L A M A T I O N <br />MINING•SAF ETY <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.