Laserfiche WebLink
waterfowl habitat. Several small islands created in the ponds should provide some nesting habitat for waterfowl. A <br />meandering shoreline could also enhance the ponds by creating more surface area for aquatic vegetation and hiding <br />cover for waterfowl and other aquatic species. I would suggest creating 30 feet of meandering shoreline for every 100 <br />feet of pond shoreline. <br />Most of the better quality habitat exists on the riparian portion of the permit area, and the greatest impacts to wildlife <br />will occur in those locations where some native riparian vegetation is dominant. Native vegetation along the riparian <br />zone should be spazed wherever possible. Additionally, non-native species such as Tamarisk, Russian Olive, <br />Knapweed and other weed species should be eradicated in the permit area. The removal of the above mentioned <br />vegetation will be critical in creating a healthy riparian habitat during the phases of re-vegetation. The proposed <br />reseeding of the upland azeas on site should be beneficial for wildlife once the area is reclaimed. <br />Visual and noise buffers should be considered wherever possible to reduce impacts to wildlife over the life of the <br />gravel operation. The increase in noise from vehicles and mining machinery, along with the increase of human <br />activity, will likely force some of the wildlife species to abandon the area. Buffers could consist of enhancement of <br />woody vegetation along with earthen berms. The vegetative buffers could screen visual and noise impacts from some <br />of the more important habitat areas such as the heron rookery, the riparian corridor, and the large islands in the permit <br />area. Cottonwood and willow plantings would grow quickly and could provide some buffering effects along these <br />areas. <br />The applicants could consider purchasing similaz properties along the river corridor in order to establish conservation <br />easements to mitigate for habitat conversion and disturbance at this proposed site. The protection of similar habitats <br />along the Colorado River could provide wildlife with refuge azeas that could be managed specifically for wildlife <br />habitat. <br />The Colorado Division of Wildlife would appreciate the opportunity to work with the landowners and applicants in <br />creating a public fishing or hunting easement on the property when mining operations have concluded. This property <br />could provide an opportunity for waterfowl hunting or possible fishing access to the river. Providing hunting and <br />fishing opportunities for youths is critical to the recmitment of future anglers and hunters. This property could assist <br />the Division of Wildlife with its long term goal of providing opportunities for youths and other sportspersons. <br />Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments on this important land use issue. If you have any questions, <br />please contact Brian Gray. <br />Sincerely, <br />Dean Riggs, ArV e Wildlife Manager <br />cc: John Bredehoft <br />Ron Velazde <br />John Toolen <br />Brian Gray <br />