My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE109009
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
100000
>
PERMFILE109009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:01:29 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 5:38:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2002078
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
7/23/2003
Doc Name
Response to Adequacy Review
From
WSI Weiland Inc.
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Coulson Excavating Company, Inc. -Stroh Gravel Pit <br />Exhibit S -Permanent Nian-Made Structures <br />Background <br />One permanent man-made structure occurs within 200 feet of the permit azea. The <br />structure is an 8-inch diameter steel, high-pressure, liquids petroleum pipeline located <br />beneath the ground surface that runs through the project azea (see Exhibit C). An attempt <br />was made to come to an agreement with the owner of the pipeline (Kaneb Pipeline Co), <br />however Coulson would not agree to Kaneb's requested 50' setback and 3:1 slope. A <br />Geotechnical Stability analysis is presented here to show that a setback of 40' regardless <br />of slope is adequate to protect the pipeline. <br />Prior to any excavation, the exact location of the centerline of the pipeline will be <br />surveyed and flagged and a land surveyor will stake out the setback. <br />Analysis <br />Then slope stability analysis was performed through application of the GEOSYSTEM <br />Slope Stability Analysis program SB-SLOPE. Analysis was performed with a O.SH: 1 V <br />pit wall slope (see Figure 1). Table 1 summarizes the pazameters input into SB-SLOPE. <br />Table 1-Soil Physical Properties <br />Soil Density <br />(pefl* Cohesion <br />(~Sfl** Phi (~)** <br />Overburden (dry) 96 50 24 <br />Gravel (dry) 100 25 • 30* <br />Gravel (saturated) 134 0 35 <br />Weathered Claystone <br />(saturated) 115 0 14 <br />Intact Claystone (dry) 102 700 26 <br />* Budhu, Muni. 2000. Soil Mechanics & Foundations. New York: John Wiley & <br />Sons, Inc. <br />** Sorenson, Allen (Division of Minerals & Geology). 2002. Memo emailed to Peter <br />Wayland of Weiland Sugnet, Inc., Lakewood, CO. <br />• Estimated value. <br />Results and Conclusions <br />The slope analysis was run with the geometry input parameters given in Figure 1 and soil <br />properties given in Table 1. The model determined a safety factor of 1.04 with a failure <br />surface at 37 ft measured from toe of slope. Given the conservative soil property values <br />and an additional setback distance of 3 ft from the modeled, it is concluded that a 40ft <br />setback regazdless of slope is adequate to protect the Kaneb pipeline from damage or <br />movement. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.