Laserfiche WebLink
<br />-22- I~vised 0C7 ' 0 1481 <br />as well as frequency determinations is provided at tte end of each cargxrter <br />printout. Production data are presented for species and life form for each <br />exclosure in grassland and upland ~; t,n~ch affected and control areas in <br />Appendix B, Part 2. Oven dry we~.ghts are presented for all species. <br />Wet weights and percent moisture content are presented for all species . <br />except shrubs aryl trees. A sws~ry of data over all transects is provided <br />at the end of each print-out. <br />Basal cover data are sum~arized for all affected and control areas by- <br />vegetation types in Table S. 7bta1 vegetation basal cover was similar <br />for all areas sailed ranging frffi 9.78 on the grassland-affected to 14.48 <br />on the grassland-control. The percent of gmwrl Dover attributEd to <br />littcr-roc]c was rturch higher on the grassla~-affected area. (71.28) than <br />the other areas. Conversely, percent bare ground was laaest on this site <br />(5.08) and highest in upland sagebrush vegetation on the affected site <br />(41.68). <br />• Su[miazy dry weight production data are presented in Table 6 for grass^ <br />land and upland sagebrush vegetation sampled at affected and central <br />' auras. As faith total vegetatron cover, productivity was similar at <br />all sites with only a 268 differnnce between the type showing the lowest <br />production, grassland oontzol (682.6 lhs/acre), ar~cl the most productive <br />type, upland sagebrush affected (917.3 lbs/acre). Fsltire arrea production <br />was 835.6 lbg/acre for the affected areas and 768.1 ibsfa¢e for oonttnl <br />sites. <br />• (Revised March 2006) Attachment 2.05.6(2}1-27 <br />