My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE108825
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
100000
>
PERMFILE108825
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:01:18 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 5:23:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1998014
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
2/25/1998
Doc Name
CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS REGULAR OPERATION 112 RECLAMATION PERMIT APPLICATION FORM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />adjacent upland for fish, waterfowl, and road-killed carrion. Bald eagles may infrequently hunt <br />the open fields of the Ranch during the winter months. There are no known high use, preferred <br />areas, eagle nests or communal roosts in the vicinity of the Ranch. <br />The peregrine falcon (Falco peregrinus) is listed as a federally endangered species. However, <br />there aze no known active, inactive, or historic eyries or hack sites in the vicinity of the Ranch. <br />The federally endangered Colorado squawfish (Prychocheilus Lucius), bonytail chub (Gila <br />elegans), humpback chub (Gila cypha), and razorback sucker (Xyrauchon texanus) have been <br />collected as faz north as Grand Junction, with the exception of the Colorado squawfish, which <br />was collected as far upstream as Palisade. <br />None of the other federal candidates are potentially present on the Gypsum Ranch due to <br />inappropriate habitats, andfor specific geographical restrictions. <br />EFFECTS OF MINING /RECLAMATION ON WILDLIFE <br />The agricultural habitat to be lost during the mining process is of low value to most wildlife <br />species present in the area of the Ranch. Mice, voles and pocket gophers reside there full-time. <br />However, the loss of this habitat would have no impact on their populations in the Eagle River <br />Valley. When the mine is reclaimed as an agricultural use, these species would repopulate the <br />habitat. Since the bald eagle does not have any nests or communal roosts in the project area, the <br />mining and reclamation process will have minimal impact to this species. Wintering deer using <br />the floodplain would be minimally disturbed by the mining operations. Impacts to deer <br />populations generally occur during the coldest months of the yeaz, when the mining operations <br />are at their lowest activity levels. The mining operations, causing loss of agricultural habitat, <br />would have a minimal impact on the game birds, waterfowl, small game and furbeazers. This is <br />due to the agricultural habitat not being of great value to these species. <br />The primary impact due to mining is on the raptors. Most raptors avoid azeas where noise and <br />human activities are high. Ared-tailed hawk pair is currently nesting in a tree located in the <br />floodplain. However, mining disturbances could cause this pair to abandon this nest site. It is <br />likely that no mitigation would be required under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act during the first <br />few phases of mining. Later mining phases may require mitigation if the nest remains active. <br />The Colorado Division of Wildlife (CDOW) has reviewed the proposed layout and their <br />assessment is included in this Exhibit. The CDOW's primary recommendation was to avoid <br />disturbing the portion of the upper terrace located to the north of the existing fence line, north to <br />the lower terrace along the Eagle River. The proposed Mine Plan does not impact the above <br />described areas. The limits of excavation have been set using the existing fence line as a <br />boundary. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.