My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE108704
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
100000
>
PERMFILE108704
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:01:11 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 5:12:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1984076
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
6/19/1984
Doc Name
DDD OPERATIONS FN M-84-076
From
MLRD
To
ROBINSON BRICK CO
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Michael G. Leidich -3- June 20, 1984 <br />Exhibit J <br />7. Rule 2.12(10) requires that the on-site vegetation information for a <br />proposed permit area for a 112 application be quantitative in terms of <br />estimates of cover and height for the principal species in each lifeform. It <br />further requires the relationship between vegetation and soils to be given and <br />that production estimates be made for areas to be reclaimed for range or <br />agriculture. The relationship between existin vegetation and topography <br />should also be shown. Please review Ruie 2.1210) and submit approximate <br />vegetation information. The Soil Conservation Service may be of some help in <br />this regard. <br />Exhibit L <br />1. In general, an analysis of your proposed reclamation costs, given the <br />plan outlined, shows them to be an underestimate. Furthermore, some parts of <br />the cost estimates are not clearly defined enough to be useful. Perhaps a <br />more detailed phasing plan for the two permit areas might be helpful in this <br />regard. In general, however, the costs involved will probably be higher than <br />you have illustrated. I will elaborate further, below. <br />2. Your cost figure for the grass seed mix seems low. Our research <br />indicates that your reclamation seeding mixture would cost at least $38/acre. <br />(3. Costs for mulch are typically at least $100/ton. Thus the appropriate <br />(figure for your plan would be $200/acre. <br />4. Backfilling would not be able to be done by the state for $.38/cu. yd., <br />and respreading topsoil would cost more than $.59/cu. yd. at current rates. A <br />more acceptable (though still very conservative) figure would be $.60/c u. yd. <br />for backfilling and $1.00/c u. yd. for topsoiling. <br />5. What is the source of your costs of $110/acre for revegetation <br />operations? Given necessary multiple passes with equipment for the necessary <br />operations, these costs are usually considerably higher. <br />6. The amounts of material to be backfilled is not justified and seems much <br />too low. Subtracting 5 acres of roadways, 20,000 cu. yd. of material <br />backfilled over 30 acres gives only 667 cubic yards per acre or about 5 inches <br />depth of backfilling per acre. Given the nature of the clay deposit, this <br />seems like an underestimate. Please justify or modify your figure for <br />backfilling volume. <br />7. Given a depth of topsoil of 10" (the average of your 8"-12" replacement <br />depth), the amount of topsoil to be replaced is much too low to reclaim the 30 <br />acres requiring such treatment. This amount of topsoil, in fact, would <br />produce a replacement depth of only about 2.5" over 30 acres. Again, please <br />justify or modify your figure for topsoil volume. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.