PERMFILE108631

• Permit No: M2007010
• IBM Index Class Name: Permit File
• Doc Date: 3/22/2007
• Doc Name: Adequacy Issues
• From: DRMS
• To: Matt Carnahan
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

Cam: ~ ~' ~ ' 'f~%~. --
STATE OF COLORADO
DIVISION OF RECLAMATION, MINING AND SAFETY
Department of Na[ural Resources
1313 Sherman St., Room 215
Denver, Colorado 80203
Phone: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
March 22, 2007 I~ECEYVED
APR Q 4 2007
"'~ Matt Carnahan Division of :?e~ ~.T:;;aon,
P.O. Box 1951 Mining 2.:d j~`EiJ
Bayfield, CO 81122
,,,,,~•'' VIA U.S. Mail and Facsimile Number [phone]
RE: Adequacyissues fora 110 Construction Materials Application,
Weber Sand and Gravel, Martinez','~File No. M-2007-010. ~
Dear Mr. Carnahan:
COLORADO
DIVISION OF
RECLAMATION
MINING
- &-
SAFETY
Bill Owens
Governor
Russell George
Executive Direttor
Ronald W. Cattany
Division Director
Natural Resource Trustee
On February 23, 2007, the Division received the above referenced application. Pursuant to
Construction Materials Rule 1.4.6 the decision date for the application is March 25, 2007.
Please be advised that the application may be deemed inadequate and may be denied on
March 25, 2007, unless the following adequacy review items are addressed to the Division's
satisfaction. If additional time is necessary to respond to these adequacy issues please request
an extension to the decision date.
1. Pursuant to Construction Materials Rule 1.6.2(1)(8), please provide proof of notice for the
newspaper publication required by Rule 1.6.2(1)(d), and notice to surface and subsurface
owners of the affected land and to surface owners within 200 feet of the permit boundary, as
required by Rule 1.6.2(1)(e).
2. In Exhibit B, Site Description, the application indicates that a storage shed is located
within 200 feet of the permit boundary but that its owner, John Martinez, does not consider the
shed to be a significant structure. During the inspection, the shed appeared to be currently in
use and not abandoned. Please submit the damage compensation agreement, required by
Rule 6.3.12(a), or the engineering evaluation, required by Rule 6.3.12(b), for the storage shed.
Please revise Exhibit L to identify the shed.
3. Please revise Exhibit B and L to identify County Road 391 as a permanent man-made
structure within 200 feet of the permit boundary, as required by Rule 6.3.2(b) and 6.3.12.
Please provide the damage compensation agreement, required by Rule 6.3.12(a), or the
engineering evaluation, required by Rule 6.3.12(b), for County Road 391.
4. In the Geotechnical Stability Exhibit, the application indicates that the final cut slope will
not be steeper than 4H:1 V (.25V:1 H). Please verify the configuration of the final cut slopes.
Please note that the Reclamation Map indicates final cut slopes at approximately 0.8H:1V.
5. In Exhibit D, Reclamation Plan, the application indicates a maximum gradient of the
reclaimed section at 3:1 slope. Please verify that the intended slope ratio is 3H:1 V, and clarify
that such slope ratio applies to road embankment (fill) areas.
Office of Office of
Mined Land Reclamation Active and InaRive Mines