My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE108142
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
100000
>
PERMFILE108142
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:00:36 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 4:19:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
6/6/2003
Doc Name
pages 2.05-84 to 2.05-166
Section_Exhibit Name
2.05 Operation & Reclamation Part 2
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
West Elk Mine <br />the Oliver No. 2 Mine area, and in other azeas where water might be encountered in an area equal <br />to, or greater than, the width of the groposed longwall panels, maximum vertical displacement <br />may be expected to approach 0.8 times the coal-extraction thickness. <br />Modern Methods of Ventilation <br />Under modern methods of ventilation, high capacity fans exhaust return air from the mine. This <br />procedure keeps the mine air pressure less than the outside air pressure. The mine is less likely to <br />"gas up" because methane is continually removed from fractures in this negative-pressure <br />environment. In the case of the Oliver No. 2 Mine, fresh air reportedly was blown into the mine <br />with a 4-foot squirrel-cage blower (Boyd Emmons, Oral Communication, November 6, 1996). In <br />this type ofpositive-pressure environment, the mine workings become more and more gassy if the <br />fan does not have a sufficient air-moving capacity to ventilate sudden inflows of methane. <br />Potential Impacts of Subsidence on Landslides <br />In October 1996, large, composite landslides with numerous scarps were observed between the <br />unnamed drainage west of Box Canyon and Box Canyon and also to the east of Box Canyon. As <br />discussed in Section 2.04.6, the slides are compartmented into essentially separate slides by <br />competent sandstone ledges. Grabens, sag ponds (complete with small wetlands), and tension <br />cracks occur between the scarps. The tension cracks could easily be confused with subsidence <br />cracks, but no mining has been done in the area. The landslides are located in or neaz the <br />northern boundary of the Box Canyon permit revision area. The southern limit of the landslides <br />is located at least 650 feet north of the nearest planned longwall panel-well outside of the <br />conservative angle of draw. <br />I fact of HiQhwav Construction <br />Based on a review of aerial photographs taken before highway construction and on <br />communication with Bob Barrett of CDOT, two apparently dormant landslides were located east <br />and west of the mouth of Box Canyon. In November 1996, however this area is covered by <br />extensive slides with vertical, horizontal, and rotational movements. These extensive slides began <br />when the new highway was under construction on the south side of the North Fork valley. The <br />lower portions of colluvial deposits and toes of the dormant landslides on these steep slopes were <br />removed during construction, which produced steeper, less stable slopes. The oversteepened <br />ground soon became unstable and began to slide. Some of the slides show movement as recently <br />as a week to a few months old as of November 1996. <br />Importance of Baseline Landslide Data <br />Baseline information on landslides in the Box Canyon permit revision area needs to be carefully <br />documented prior to mining. MCC will plan to take aerial photographs of the Box Canyon Lease <br />azea and field verify any landslides seen in the photograph, prior to mining. Some of the <br />landslide features (cracks and grabens) closely resemble subsidence feamres. However, it is Mr. <br />Dunmd's opinion that coal mine subsidence could not cause landslides nearly as severe as those <br />2.05-130 RevuedJw. l995 PR06; IN6 RN03; RevisedJmi. 1998 PR0.4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.