My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE108040
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
100000
>
PERMFILE108040
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:00:30 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 4:11:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
Sections 10 - 16
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 12 Experimental Part 3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
- 2- <br />Case I - Spoil angle of internal friction (p) • <br />Holding all other variables c <br />(a) ~ichanged from 390 to 350 <br />(b) pchanged from 370 to 350 <br />Case II - Spoil density ( ~' ) <br />(a) x'changed from 105 to 125 <br />(b) 1S chanced from 115 to 105 <br />(c) ~ changed from 115 to 125 <br />instant, we r"i nd <br />v FS= -4. 1 <br />oFS= -1.8% <br />pcf oFS = -5.9% <br />pcf oFS = -r3.4% <br />pcf ~ FS = -2.4% <br />For these two variables, ~.ve find the maximum change in .the factor of safety <br />of 10.0 percent. By using the mid-point of the range of variables, !i.e., <br />0 = 37 degress and ~'= l15 pcf), the maximum variation in the factor of <br />safety is reduced to the range of -4.2% to +1.6%. Considering the accuracy <br />of the known data we consider this range do be satisr`actory and indicative <br />that these variables do not signir"icantly influence the stability for the <br />conditions studied. The remaining variables, namely the relative location <br />of the r•rater table and angle of internal friction of the colluvium are con- <br />trolling factors in the analysis, as stated in the report. Analyses v!ere <br />conducted for four water table locations and both colluvium angles of in- <br />ternal friction. ~ ' <br />The analysis was prepared io stuoy a wide range of possibilities and then • <br />make a judgment based on the results. Simple comoarision of numerical values <br />of the computed factor of safet~r is not pepper evaluaticn. The engineer and <br />she r•evi.e~.ver must look beyond the numeers and evaluaie the physical meaning <br />of the analysis. In the case of the Colowyo slope stability problem, all the <br />analyses indicate a factor of safety of more than 1.5 except for high ~•aater i <br />table conditions. The implication is that the slope is probably stable ender <br />dry conditions, but should a high water table develop, there may be failures. <br />6y carefully examining the critical circles presented, rde find the ground <br />water will cause small slips at the toe, mostly within the spoil. Experience <br />shows this to be reasonable, especially for granular material where the <br />strength depends entirely on the normal forces. The addition of water reduces <br />these farces and causes the failure. Further examination of the water table <br />cases, r•rhere the strength of the colluvium cnanges from 26° tp 400, indicates <br />the failure mode chanq_es from a shallow seated toe slip circle to a deep <br />sewed failure ',vith a much higher factor of safety. The interesting feature <br />is the location of the critical circles. As in Case 4 (lo~~rest '.rater table, <br />colluvium ki = Z60), all the critical circles for fall mostly within the <br />spoil and the bedrock and do not lie '.vithin the colluvium. Considering the <br />probable strength of the bedrock, it is our opinion that a deep seated failure <br />is unlikely. The analysis basically indicates for dry conditions the slope <br />is table and that failure is most likely to occur in the spoil if a high water <br />table develops. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.