PERMFILE107950 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Case No. 94CW036, Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Decree of the Court Approving Absolute and Conditional Ground Water Rights, Plan of Augmentation and for Change of Water Rights, Application of the City of Black Hawk, Page 3 Jan Gutierrez; Ron and Bobbi Kohen; Bill Locricchio; O. Viki Luna and Forrest B. Robinson; Deanna L. Macy; Cathy J. and Lawayne G. Riedlinger; William D. and Penny Round; Marvin B. and Billie Jean Smith; Merritt E. and Ramona J. Smith; Stephen R. Strauch; C. Wendell and Charla Waggoner; and Evelyn Waldman. The two remaining pro se parties, Michael Vincent and Kimberly Vincent, advised the Court by letter dated May 2, 2002 that they did not plan to submit any further documentation or participate in the trial in this matter. 7. Timely and adequate notice of the Application, Amended Application, Second Amended Application, Third Amendment to Application and Fourth Amendment to Application was published, as required by law, and the Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this proceeding and over all persons and water rights affected thereby, whether they have appeared or not. The time for filing statements of opposition has expired. 8. The following parties have withdrawn their statements of opposition: Beverly Building Company; David and Kathryn Fulenwider; Golden; Albert B. Dawkins; Lucie A. Crawley; the Vidler Tunnel Water Company, Inc. and the Coors Brewing Company. Objectors The Farmers Reservoir and Irrigation Company and Jefferson County, Colorado, did not participate at trial in this matter. 9. Objectors, the Cities ofArvada, Central, Northglenn, Thornton and Westminster, the Coors Brewing Company, the Farmers' High Line Canal and Reservoir Company, The Church Ditch Company, FRICO, and the Board of County Commissioners for Gilpin County, entered into stipulations as to the water quality portion of this matter, the terms of said stipulations are hereby included in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law set forth below. Said parties are precluded by said stipulations from raising water quality injury issues after this decree is entered under the jurisdiction of the Court retained in paragraph 33, below, except as provided by said stipulations. 10. The following parties have entered into stipulations with the Applicant on the basis that those parties will not further oppose entry of a decree herein, and said stipulations are approved by the Court and shall bind the parties to each said stipulation: ]O.a. David Douglass; 10.6. The Consolidated Mutual Water Company; 10.c. The Agricultural Ditch and Reservoir Company;