Laserfiche WebLink
58 <br />Table 10. Mean final infiltration capacities (cm/hr) from applied <br />rainfall of 7.6 cm/hr. <br />>> <br />% ~. .J <br />• <br />Coal Region <br />Green River <br />Green River <br />Green River <br />North Park <br />North Park <br />Green River <br />Raton Mesa <br />Green River <br />Green River <br />Green River <br />Canon City <br />Canon City <br />Coal Field <br />Yampa <br />Yampa <br />Yampa <br />North Park <br />North Park <br />Yampa <br />Trinidad <br />Yampa <br />Yampa <br />Yampa <br />Canon City <br />Canon City <br />Mean Final Infiltra- <br />Sampling tion Capacityl <br />Site (cm/hr) <br /> <br />Energy Fuels No. 1 1.2 <br />Edna 1.5 <br />(second site) <br />Edna 2.0 <br />(first site) <br />Marr Strip No. 1 2.0 <br />(second site) <br />Marr Strip No. 1 3.0 <br />(first site) <br />Empire Energy 3.4 <br />(second site) <br />Delagua 3.5 <br />Empire Energy 3.8 <br />(first site) <br />Energy Fuels No. 3 3.9 <br />Seneca 4.4 <br />GEC S and A 4.9 <br />(first site) <br />GEC S and A 5.2 <br />(second site) <br />• <br />Green River Yampa Hayden Gulch 5.4 ~Y ~ I <br />Uinta Danforth Hills Colowyo 5.5 '0 <br />1Vertical lines group sampling sites which are not significantly <br />different with 95 percent confidence limits. <br />I <br />