Laserfiche WebLink
48 <br />Ta61e 9. K factors of topsail and spoils compared. <br />(tonnes per hectare per 100 meter-tonnes per hectare) <br /> <br /> <br />Coal <br />Region <br />Coal Field Sampling <br />Site Mean K Factor <br />Topsoil Spoils <br />Green River Yampa Seneca3 1.34 <br />Green River Yampa Edna 1.05 1.25 <br /> - (first site) <br />Green River Yampa Energy Fuels 0.95 0.92 <br /> No. 3 <br />Green River Yampa Empire Energy 0.92 1.02 <br /> (first site) <br />Green River Yampa Empire Energy 0.85 0.95 <br /> (second site) <br />Green River Yampa Hayden Gulch 0.79 0.75 <br />Green River Yampa Energy Fuels 0.75 0.98 <br />• No. 1 <br />Green River Yampa Edna 2 <br />d sit <br />( <br />) 0.56 <br /> secon <br />e <br />Canon City Canon City GEC S and A 0.72 0.82 <br /> (second site) <br />Canon City Canon City GEC S and A 0.62 0.79 <br /> (first site) <br />Raton Mesa Trinidad Delagua 0.62 0.66 <br />North Park North Park Marr Strip 0.59 0.95 <br /> No. 1 <br /> (first site) <br />North Park North Park Marr Strip 0.59 0.89 <br /> No. 1 <br /> (second site) <br />Uinta Danforth Ni11s Colowyo 0.56 0.66 <br />1Vertical lines group sampling sites which are not significantly <br />Zdifferent with 95 percent confidence limits. <br />. <br />Site <br />3 was not topsoiled. <br />"Soil " loss estimates of spoils were not computed. <br />