Laserfiche WebLink
2.04.6 <br />• ,RESPONSE continued <br />the mining zone, it will not be considered here. The Lewis shale <br />consists mainly of a dark gray, homogeneous marine shale. It is <br />conformable with the underlying Williams Fork Formation. The <br />contact with the Williams Fork is not sharply defined, and there- <br />fore it was arbitrarily placed at the top of the beds, which <br />consist mainly of sandstone, sandy shale, and coal as differen- <br />tiated from overlying beds of mainly gray shale (Bass et al. <br />1955) . The Lewis shale is found immediately north and east of <br />the site. <br />The Williams Fork formation consists of a sequence of sand- <br />stones, siltstones, mudstones, shales, and coals lying between <br />the Lewis shale and the Trout Creek sandstone. Included are a <br />lower unit and an upper unit separated by the ledge forming <br />Twenty Mile sandstone. The upper unit of the Williams Fork is 7 <br />roughly 600 ft. thick and includes the five coal beds within the <br />mining zone of the proposed Hayden Gulch mine as well as sev- <br />eral beds below the zone. The coals are separated by silt- <br />stones, mudstones, and sandstones. <br />At the base of the upper unit is the massive, wellsorted, medium <br />grained, white to tan Twenty Mile sandstone. The Twenty Mile <br />is about 100 ft. thick in the mine area and forms distinctive <br />ledges below the southern end on the mine site. <br />The lower unit of the Williams Fork is about ]000 ft. thick in the <br />mine area. It consists of 400 ft. to 500 ft. of grey marine shale <br />with a few sandy zones, underlain by a sequence of sandstones, <br />siltstones, mudstones, shales, and coal seams. <br />Below the Williams Fork is the Iles formation. it is capped by <br />the 100 ft.thick Trout Creek sandstone, which is similar in <br />composition to the Twenty Mile. The Trout Creek forms white <br />ledges about I mi. to the south of the site. Below the Trout <br />