My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE107193
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
100000
>
PERMFILE107193
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:59:45 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 2:51:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
10/14/2007
Section_Exhibit Name
2.05.5 Postmining Land Uses
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
115
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mine Dischar¢es <br />The 1998 inflows and the estimated futwe mine inflows aze shown in Exhibit 49, Table E49-4. Projected mine <br />discharges aze shown on Exhibit 49, Tables E49-6 through E49-8. The mining rate used in these projections was <br />8,000,000 tons per year. An increased mining rate will not effect the maximum flow rates but only move them <br />forwazd in time. The mine groundwater inflow numbers are discussed above in the Ground Water Inflow to the <br />Mine section. <br />Much of the mine inflows will be dischazged and removed through the Fish Creek borehole. During periods when <br />these pumps are not operating the sump below the borehole fills with mine inflow water. The present (1998/1999) <br />pool volume is estimated to be 546,000,000 gallons (Ground Water Inflow to the Mine. Mine Water Balance) <br />When both pumps at the borehole aze running it is capable of dischazging at approximately 850 gpm, although this <br />rate may be increased to 1,200 gpm if warranted, however, the average annual futwe pumping rate is estimated to <br />be 300 gpm At this rate, it is estimated that it will take 1.4 years to drop the pool elevation to the required <br />operational level of 5,800 feet. At that time, the pumping rate will be maintained at a rate sufficient to maintain the <br />water level by removing inflows from the WMD. This rate is estimated to be 55 gpm if no water is transferred <br />from other parts of the mine. <br />As of June 1999, the mine had completed a system to recycle some of the water that is produced underground. The <br />average amount the system can recycle is over 175 gpm. The average annual recycling rate has been conservatively <br />estimated to be 100 gpm. This will allow for the addition of some makeup water if needed to dilute any salt build- <br />up. However, it does not take into account that additional water can be used to replace surface uses of water such <br />as in the truck-wash, road watering, and the preparation plant, further decreasing the water dischazged from Site <br />109. Three cases are presented. In Case I (Exhibit 49, Table E49-6) all the water is pumped from Site 109 except <br />the WMD inflow to the Fish Creek Borehole sump. In Case 2 (Exhibit 49, Table E49-7}, after the water level in the <br />sump is lowered, 245 gpm of water is transferred into the sump from the eastern and northern parts of the mine. In <br />Case 3 (Exhibit 49, Table E49-8), water is continuously diverted into the sump, and the dischazge rate from Site 1 <br />15 increased, to compensate for the diversion. <br />C The average water quality discharged from the Site 115 was estimated by incrementally averaging the average <br />conductivity in the water in storage with the estimated conductivity of the WMD ground water inflow (See Tables <br />E49-9 through 11 in Exhibit 49). This equation assumes that the present pool is homogeneous and that there will be <br />instantaneous mixing of the two waters. In actuality, neither condition is met in the short ten-n, but for the long <br />ten-n estimated of average discharge quality, it is appropriate. The Fish Creek Borehole is pumping from the <br />bottom of the pool where the water has been standing the longest. Therefore, it will have the worst water quality. <br />The mine inflow will only partially mix with the large pool of water, however, as the pool reduces in size mixing <br />will occw more quickly. The results of this deviation from the equation's assumptions aze that the eazly time <br />estimations aze low and the late time estimations are high. Because the inflow rate in the first 1.4 yeazs is much <br />less than the outflow rate, and the pool is quite large, the under-estimation of the conductivity will be small. <br />The average water quality discharged from the portal (Site 109), and other situations, was estimated using a simple <br />flow weighted mass balance equation. The equation is of the form: <br />Ce~~~ _ ((C~ * Q~) + (Cz * Qz) + •(C~ * Qa) / (Q~ + Qz +--Qa <br />Where: C, =concentration from sowce I <br />Q, =flow from sowce I <br />C„ =concentration from sowce n <br />Q~ =flow from sowce n <br />Based upon the above inputs, in Case 1 (Exhibit 49, Table E49-6) the flow rate from Site ]09 will increase from <br />342 (0.76 cfs) to 612 gpm (1.36 cfs) at life-of--mine. The conductivity will decrease from 3,800 gmhos/cm to 3,100 <br />µmhos/cm. The discharge from Site 115 will average 300 gpm for the fast 1.4 years and then 55 gpm for the <br />remainder of the life of mine. In Case 2 the flow rate from Site 109 will peak at approximately 400 gpm (0.89 cfs) <br />at the end of the fast 1.4 years and at the end of the life-of--mine. The conductivities in the Case 2 dischazges from <br />the portal will be the same as Case 1. In Case 3, water is diverted from the EMD, North Mains and 6-Right azea <br />TR07-60 2.05-152 05/01/07 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.