My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE107011
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
100000
>
PERMFILE107011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:59:35 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 2:34:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
4/8/2005
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 40 West Flatiron Environmental Assessment
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
127
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
F)~can~6er 9.2003 <br />3.4.1 Existing Conditions <br />Surface Water <br />The LBA tract area encompasses portions of the Raven Creek watershed, which is tributary to the North <br />Fork of the Gunnison River. The unnamed drainage in Section 13 (T13S, R90W) is the only drainage <br />overlying potential coal extraction areas in the LBA tract, and is an ephemeral drainage, flowing only in <br />response to snowmelt runoff or intense thunderstorm events. Dry Creek, which is a perennial stream in <br />the southeast portion of the lease tract area, would be outside the proposed underground mining area. <br />Raven Creek is a perennial drainage and flows through the northeast portion of the lease tract. The 8 <br />seam mine plan, assumed as the RFDS, does not propose mining beneath this area. <br />Ground Water <br />Given the relatively steep gradients of the drainage channels in the LBA tract area, there are limited <br />shallow alluvial or colluvial deposits that could provide far shallow ground water bearing deposits. The <br />unnamed drainage in Section 13 does not receive enough water to maintain year-round flows or to <br />saturate the minor alluvial/colluvial deposits in the drainage. No known springs occur in the LBA tract. <br />r~ <br />U <br />Bedrock contains ground water to a limited degree, and it occurs in the LBA tract area in isolated perched <br />zones and in fracture/fault areas. Ground water may also occur in the coal seams and associated strata. <br />In the lease tract area, the coal seams and associated strata dip to the northeast. The upper units outcrop <br />in the North Fork Valley and are drained over a large area such that ground water occurrences in these <br />units are rare. The B seam and the overlying coal interburden and overburden units are generally well • <br />drained on the.riorth side of the North Fork of the Gunnison River within and in the vicinity of the lease <br />~ - <br />tract area. <br />In general, the coal seams mined in the North Fork Valley are dry. The West Elk,mine has encountered <br />ground water inflows associated with faults and fractures. The ground water encountered was determined <br />to be part of a deeply circulating system, which has been out of contact with the atmosphere for several <br />thousand years. The BLM reports that the anticipated moisture of the coal in the LBA tract is about five <br />percent. Experience in the area shows that the Mesaverde strata are minimally saturated. This is due to <br />the relative impermeable nature of the strata, and that recharge is minimal. The steep slopes in the area <br />promote runoff rather than infiltration of precipitation. <br />MCC has experienced water inflows when mining has intercepted faults. The amount of water has varied <br />from a few gallons to thousands of gallons. This intercepted ground water has ceased flowing over the <br />period of a few weeks. There has been no indication that the water encountered in the mine is in <br />connection with water resources on the land surface. Chemical testing has shown that ground water <br />encountered in the mine is part of a deep, inactive ground water system that is not in direct contact with <br />near-surface water. Faults are anticipated in the lease tract, and although it is uncertain whether these <br />faults would contain water, it was assumed for this analysis that faults encountered during underground <br />mining activities may flow around 1,000 gpm for a few days when encountered, then cease flowing <br />(Koontz, 2003). Any ground water encountered would be handled by the existing system in place in the <br />MCC underground operation. Any water discharged would beat the National Pollutant Discharge <br />Elimination System (NPDES) permit point and would meet discharge water quality standards. <br />..nvironmer,~ai II,esesei;7ent <br />4"lest t=fa:~;an I_~~`. -i ract <br />L+uIlC IS:]il i~Ol: r;iti, ~;nir;{~3 ~i0 <br />Pace 3-Ei <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.