My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE106953
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
100000
>
PERMFILE106953
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:59:32 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 2:28:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 69 Section C I. Construction Approach & Construction Monitoring Program
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• BACK CALCULATIONS AND SENSITMTY ANALYSES <br />If it can be determined that a slope has failed in the recent past and that pre-failure conditions can <br />be estimated, then a common tool for establishing some of the parameters is a technique known as <br />`back calculation' or `sensitivity analysis'. Pre-failure slope geometry can be reconstructed in <br />most cases, groundwater conditions can be assumed, and slope failure mechanisms can be <br />hypothesized. The shear strength parameters c (cohesion) and ~ (phi, angle of friction) can be <br />estimated by this method. The process involves two iterative steps: <br />1. The best possible estimates must be made of the soil strengths and units weights using the <br />available information. Laboratory tests and strength correlations provide an effective basis for <br />these estimates. The slope geometry and groundwater conditions at the time of failure must <br />also be established. <br />2. The slide should be analyzed using the estimated properties. If the calculated factor of safety <br />is equal to 1 the properties and conditions represent a reasonable model of the slide. If the <br />calculated factor of safety is not equal to 1, the strength aze adjusted until a factor of safety of <br />1 is achieved. The adjustment ratio need not be the same for all materials involved in the slide. <br />Logically, larger adjustments should be made for strengths that are considered to involve <br />greater degrees of uncertainty. Further adjustments must be made to account for hypothesized <br />failure mechanisms. <br />The following table shows the iterations for stability sections A-A', D-D' and F-F' that were made <br />• in the process of performing a sensitivity analysis. The assumptions for this analysis were that the <br />slope consisted of a homogeneous and infinite slope of a single material type with groundwater at <br />the elevation of Sylvester Gulch. <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.