My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE106811
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
100000
>
PERMFILE106811
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:59:25 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 2:17:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980005A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
1/26/2005
Section_Exhibit Name
Tab 12 Operation Plan
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
117
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
State Reg. <br />• OVERBURDEN HANDLING OPERATIONS - <br />2.05.3(1), As mentioned previously (under "Mining Operations <br />2.05.3(6) Life-of-Mine"), the geologic conditions at Seneca II are such <br />that the operation cannot be conducted by utilizing <br />conventional area mining methods. In a conventional area <br />surface mine, the coal seam being mined lies in a relatively <br />level plane with the outcrop at a lower elevation with respect <br />to the surrounding terrain. As the elevation rises, the <br />overburden becomes deeper. During development of a <br />conventional pit progression plan, the mine would be opened <br />along the outcrop with a "box cut" pit generally paralleling <br />the strike of the coal seam. Mining would then progress in the <br />direction of higher surface elevations with each successive pit <br />excavating deeper overburden. Operations then continue until <br />the overburden becomes too deep and exceeds the physical <br />capability of the primary excavation equipment or becomes <br />uneconomical due to the high costs involved. <br />• At Seneca II, the conventional development techniques have been <br />modified with some very beneficial results. With the coal <br />outcrop at the higher elevations, it is virtually impossible to <br />mine along the cropline and progress toward the deeper coal. <br />Far one reason, each successive pit would be made at a lower <br />elevation and the overburden would have to be cast uphill into <br />the adjacent open pit. This would place severe limitations on <br />the dumping height and operating radius of the dragline as well <br />as create a very unstable and unsafe, spoil configuration. <br />Another reason is that coal haulage trucks cannot safely <br />operate on haulage routes that parallel the strike of the coal <br />surface unless considerable extra road building effort is <br />expended in each pit. <br />As mentioned earlier, each pit is oriented approximately <br />perpendicular to the strike of the slope. The main reasons for <br />• this are increased safety, more efficient coal loading and <br />haulage, and relative ease of overburden removal. Two other <br />12-47 Revised 8/27/86 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.