My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE106678
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
100000
>
PERMFILE106678
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:59:19 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 2:05:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
6/13/2005
Doc Name
Exhibit 60D 2004 Geologic Hazard Field Observations for the South of Divide Mining Area
Type & Sequence
PR10
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2004 Geologic Hazard Field Observations <br />South of Divide Mining Area <br />• based on the following observations made while conducting geologic mapping for the USGS <br />in the Somerset-Paonia azea: <br />1. h1 the Somerset Mine, coal pillazs were extracted beneath Beaz Creek in a 400 to 460 foot <br />wide panel at an average overburden depth to mined coal of 260 feet (overburden depth <br />range of 220 to 300 feet). No cracks were observed in the clay and silt alluvium <br />(estimated to be 10 to 15 feet thick) and the underlying colluvium (estimated at 30 to 50 <br />feet thick), even though cracks one to two inches wide were observed in the Beaz Creek <br />road, and cracks as much as 1 foot wide and 25 to 50 feet long were observed in the <br />weathered bedrock and thin colluvium (estimated to be 1 to 3 feet thick) on the side <br />slopes of Beaz Creek. <br />2. No change in flow was observed downstream from the site and, to the author's <br />knowledge, no loss in stream flow was reported (Final Environmental Impact Statement, <br />Tron Point Coal Lease Tract & Elk Creek Coal Lease Tract, Delta and Gunnison Counties, <br />• Colorado, February 2000, Appendix K, p. K-12 and K-19). <br />3. The more uniform longwall mining method (compared to room-and-pillar mining) will <br />make surface cracking and loss of water even less likely than the room-and-pillaz mining <br />method in Dry Fork and its tributaries. Furthermore, the minimum overburden depth is <br />greater (by about 15 to 35 percent) in the Dry Fork azea than it was in the Beaz Creek <br />azea. <br />8.3 Aerial Photo Location 3 <br />• <br />This observation point is located at the upper part of a lazge landslide and rockfall azea near the <br />head of Lion Gulch in the southwestern part of the South of Divide mining azea (Figure 9 and <br />Map 1). <br />• The northeastern, and active, part of the slide azea is located above the southwestern part of <br />projected longwall panel E8 in overburden ranging from 200 to 400 feet. <br />831-032.621 Wright Water Engineers, Inc. Page 29 <br />November 2004 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.