Laserfiche WebLink
' ~ Stipulation <br />Cases Nos. 92-CW-059, 92-C1Y-163, 94-CW-Oi6 <br />Pale 5 <br />borne by the District. Copies of sampling results will be provided to Black Hawk and Central City; <br />who will be responsible forproviding copies, as received, to any stipulator that wishes to receive the <br />results. Results may be provided in hazd copy by mail, electronic format by e-mail or other manner <br />that is convenient and satisfactory. Black Hawk, Central City, Gilpin County, or the District may <br />elect at any time to sample more frequently at the requestor's cost. With reasonable notice, any <br />stipulator may request split samples from the District. Any stipulatoz may collect and analyze flow <br />weighted composite samples independently at its own ebst. <br />2.8.1 In deterrn;n;ng the number o£ days of TP and TIN excursions, the day on which a sample <br />shows a TP or TIN excursion shall be counted, and every subsequent day until' a subsequent sample <br />does not show an excursion shall also be counted. For example, if a sample taken on a Monday <br />shows an excursion, while the next sample, taken on the ensuing Friday, does not, then Monday, <br />Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday shall all be counted as excursions. Further, all samples <br />collected and analyzed by a certifiedlaboratory and meeting acceptable quality assurance and quality <br />control procedures shall be included in the calculation of seasonal poundage results. <br />2.9 Any ruling or decree in this case or in a Subsequent Water Court Case using Black Hawk or <br />Central City's effluent as an augmentation source or substitute supply shall contain the following <br />finding: <br />"Any findings regarding the quality of effluent as an augmentation source or <br />substitute supply made herein, and in accordance with the stipulation in Cases Nos. <br />92-CW-059, 94-CW-036, 92-CW-168 and 94-CW-277 among B1ackHawk, Central <br />City, GIlpin County, the cities of Thornton, Westminstex and Northglenn, the <br />Farmers' High Line Canal and Reservoir Company, et a1., dated January _, 2000, <br />are the result of compromise and settlement among the parties in the specific <br />circumstances oftfiese cases." <br />3. Remedies. Remedies for the failure or failures' of the parties to comply with the Terms and <br />Conditions set forth in Section 2 above shall be incorporated into the final decrees in each of the <br />above captioned cases and in Subsequent Water Court Cases, as follows: <br />3.1 After December 31, 2005, effluent from the Existing Plant shall not be used to offset out-of- <br />priority diversions or to effectuate exchanges (whether pursuant to decrees in the instant cases <br />~ 92CW059,92CW168,and94CW036,in5ubsequentWater'CourtCases,orinTemporaiySubstitute <br />Supply Plans). <br />3.2 If the Funding Parties, or any ofthem, fail to comply with the terms of Paragraph 2.3 above, <br />(escroev/funding agreement for $1,500,000); then the final decrees in the instant cases, as well as in <br />~. <br />